Bergmann v Bergmann and Another (2022/042484) [2024] ZAGPJHC 854 (29 August 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/042484
Judge
WJ du Plessis
The High Court struck the application from the roll because the applicant failed to comply with court rules and the practice manual, and ordered costs on scale A.
'Tlam and Others v Tladi and Another (11384/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 339 (1 March 2016)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
11384/2015
Judge
NP Mali
The court dismissed an application to remove a close corporation member because the applicants failed to place sufficient evidence before court on fair value and compensation.
Klaas v Summers and Others (4407/2004) [2007] ZAWCHC 76; 2008 (4) SA 187 (C); (10 December 2007)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
4407/2004
Judge
LJ Bozalek
The court held that the applicant's conduct in executing the acknowledgments of debt did not amount to representing the corporation as contemplated by clause 13.1 of the association agreement. The instructions to pay his creditor were personal and did not purport to bind the corporation in dealings with third parties. Even the undertaking regarding the vessel arrangement was expressly personal and non-representative. The court found that, even if the applicant's conduct could be construed as representing the corporation, there was no evidence that any breach was material so as to justify forf…