Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Sasser (Jnr) and Others v Sasser (Snr) and Others (56520/2021) [2023] ZAGPPHC 2066 (10 March 2023)
The High Court upheld an exception, finding the trust beneficiaries had not pleaded facts showing the trust could not act, so the Benningfield exception did not apply.
Breetzke and Others v Alexander and Others (AR298/16) [2017] ZAKZPHC 71 (5 May 2017)
The High Court held that the appellants lacked locus standi to sue in a representative capacity over trust-related relief, and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Breetzke and Others v Alexander and Others (12922/14) [2015] ZAKZPHC 44 (8 September 2015)
The High Court upheld an exception in a trust dispute, holding that the plaintiffs lacked locus standi for a representative action because a direct action was available.
Delwerswaaksaamheidskomitee Wolmaransstad v Oersonskraal Diamante BK (609/95) [1997] ZASCA 42 (20 May 1997)
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal for a final interdict, holding that the appellant had not proved disturbance of diamond-bearing gravel on the papers.
Gross and Others v Pentz (414/95) [1996] ZASCA 78; 1996 (4) SA 617 (SCA); [1996] 4 All SA 63 (A); (22 August 1996)
The court considered whether a trust beneficiary could sue for breach of trust where a co-trustee did not institute proceedings, focusing on locus standi and the Beningfield exception.
Explore more
