Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Taxpayer D v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (VAT 1518) [2023] ZATC 5 (23 March 2023)
The Tax Court held it lacked jurisdiction to reinstate withdrawn VAT and income tax appeals, and upheld SARS’s point in limine.
Anthony and Another v Nedbank Limited (54741/2018) [2020] ZAGPPHC 426 (24 August 2020)
The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against summary judgment, finding it was late and non-compliant with Rule 49, with no condonation sought.
Moipone Fleet (Pty) Ltd v Vimla Engines Gearbox Diff and Suspension (Pty) Ltd and Another (86552/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 427 (12 August 2020)
The court held that the respondents’ appeal had lapsed and allowed immediate execution of the earlier order, with police and locksmith assistance.
Amantusi (Hanxa) Royal Family and Another v Premier of the Eastern Cape Province and Others (08/2020) [2020] ZAECMHC 27 (15 July 2020)
The appeal was removed from the roll after the court found the third and fourth respondents had not been properly served or notified, so the appeal could not fairly proceed.
Janse van Rensburg v Obiang and Another (A338/2018, 22470/2015) [2019] ZAWCHC 53 (10 May 2019)
The High Court rejected an application to strike out an appeal for lack of a formally authenticated power of attorney and for failure to provide security for costs.
Thahameso Ntswanatsatsi Thusanang Taxi Association and Another v Qwaqwa United Taxi Association (5204/2013) [2014] ZAFSHC 100 (26 June 2014)
The court held that written reasons for judgment are a jurisdictional fact for an application for leave to appeal. In this matter, no written reasons had been furnished, and the applicants were out of time for requesting reasons. The application for leave to appeal was therefore premature and could not be entertained. The court emphasized that entertaining such an application would allow parties to circumvent the rules regarding the time limits for requesting reasons and applying for leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was struck off the roll.
Source excerpt
Explore more
