Mynhardt and Another v Deventer and Others (033896/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 310 (3 April 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
033896/2023
Judge
MKHABELA
The High Court dismissed leave to appeal against setting aside an ex parte order, finding no merit in the urgency complaint and fatal non-compliance with Rule 57(3)(b).
Tsentsa Construction (Pty) Ltd v Impala Platinum Mine - Rustenburg (UM 149/23) [2023] ZANWHC 149 (24 August 2023)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
UM 149/23
Judge
Reddy
The court found that the applicant failed to meet the requirements for urgency under Rule 6(12). The applicant did not provide sufficient reasons why substantial redress could not be afforded at a hearing in due course. The timeline of events indicated that the applicant was slow to act and did not adequately explain the delay or demonstrate irreparable harm that could not be remedied by the normal court process. The grounds advanced for urgency were inadequate, and the application was accordingly struck from the roll. Costs were awarded against the applicant as there was no reason to depart…
Selepe v University of Johannesburg (2022/638) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1062 (21 April 2022)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/638
Judge
Oosthuizen-Senekal CSP
The High Court dismissed an urgent challenge to the University of Johannesburg’s vaccination policy, finding the application was self-created urgency and that internal remedies were not exhausted.
Mabotwane Security Services CC v Sekhukhune District Municipality and Others (2425/2020) [2020] ZALMPPHC 96 (8 September 2020)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
2425/2020
Judge
MG Phatudi
The High Court struck an urgent tender review from the urgent roll, finding the applicant failed to explain delay and had shown self-manufactured urgency.
Du Toit v Du Plessis en Ander (364/2012) [2013] ZANCHC 10 (3 May 2013)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
364/2012
Judge
C.C Williams
The High Court ordered the respondents to pay the wasted costs of 23 March 2012 after they persisted with an expedited hearing without providing requested discovery.