Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Lephoto v Frankle Motors CC t/a Swan Motors (NCT/257336/2023/75(1)(b)) [2023] ZANCT 53 (7 December 2023)
The Tribunal removed this consumer redress application from the roll after the parties settled outside the hearing. No merits finding or cost order was made.
Logoslive (Pty) Ltd (Registration No. 2017/383828/07) v Member of the Executive Authority for Transport, Eastern Cape (182/2021) [2021] ZAECBHC 11 (10 August 2021)
The High Court awarded costs on the attorney-and-client scale after the respondent ignored directions, filed no proper opposition, and acted in bad faith.
Nedbank Limited v George and Others (2441/2015) [2015] ZAECPEHC 51 (10 September 2015)
The court found the bank was justified in issuing summons over mortgage arrears, but the matter had settled. The defendants were ordered to pay attorney-and-client costs.
Clark v Reed (51064/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 61 (26 February 2014)
The court held that an urgent maintenance application was unnecessary and ordered each party to pay their own costs after settlement.
National Union of Mineworkers and Others v Coin Security Group (Pty) Ltd t/a Protea Coin Security (C592/2007) [2010] ZALC 219 (19 July 2010)
After settlement of the merits, the Labour Court awarded the applicants costs from 17 June 2010, including two counsel and expert witness expenses.
Kanono v Road Accident Fund (7072/08) [2010] ZAFSHC 47 (13 May 2010)
The court held that costs should be taxed on Magistrates’ Court scale, finding the claim over-optimistic and not warranting High Court-scale costs.
Ostling N.O v Road Accident Fund (656/07) [2008] ZAECHC 34 (6 May 2008)
The court held that an expert psychologist’s qualifying fees were recoverable as costs, even though he was ultimately not called to testify.
Explore more
