Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [1992] ZASCA 9

Sentraalwes (Koop) Bpk v Meester van die Hooggeregshof en Andere (241/90)

Sentraalwes (Koop) Bpk v Meester van die Hooggeregshof en Andere (241/90) [1992] ZASCA 9; 1992 (3) SA 86 (AD); [1992] 2 All SA 39 (A) (5 March 1992)

Section 88 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 does not apply to special notarial bonds over specified movable property that do not confer any preference, as such bonds do not grant a statutory or common law preference over the free residue of the insolvent estate. The appellant's claim, secured by a special notarial bond, was correctly treated as a concurrent claim by the trustees, notwithstanding their erroneous reliance on section 88. The legislative intent and previous judicial interpretation confirm that only bonds conferring preference are subject to section 88, and the special notarial bo…

  • Insolvent Estate Distribution
  • Special Notarial Bonds
  • Preferent Claims
  • Interpretation Of Statutes
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.