Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
South African Legal Practice Council v Mashele (2024/103400) [2025] ZAGPPHC 577 (23 May 2025)
The High Court struck attorney Victor Mdungasi Mashele from the roll after finding he misappropriated client trust funds and failed to account for them.
South African Legal Practice Council v Koma (2023/023597) [2025] ZAGPPHC 452 (2 May 2025)
The court found that the respondent's grounds for appeal were previously raised and fully addressed in the original judgment. The respondent failed to answer the charges and ignored invitations to respond. The reference to Louw was distinguished, as the facts in Louw involved complex allegations against multiple parties, whereas in this case, the respondent acted alone and the complaints were substantiated. The court concluded that there were no reasonable prospects of success and no compelling reasons to grant leave to appeal. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed with…
Source excerpt
Tiro v Safety and Transport Management North West Province (2025/030657) [2025] ZALCJHB 259 (25 April 2025)
An urgent Labour Court application was struck off the roll after improper re-enrolment and the applicant’s non-appearance at the hearing.
K.A.M and Another v S.S.M (1060/25) [2025] ZANWHC 51 (12 March 2025)
The court found that the applicants failed to establish urgency as required by Uniform Rule 6(12)(b). The delay of seven days in bringing the application was unexplained and amounted to self-created urgency. The applicants did not demonstrate that they would suffer undue hardship if the matter was not heard urgently, as they have access to other vehicles and substantial income. The dispute regarding the Toyota motor vehicle will be determined in the magistrates court on the scheduled return date, where the applicants will have substantial redress. Consequently, the application was not suitabl…
Source excerpt
Mokoena and Another v South African Legal Practice Council (49286/2020) [2025] ZAGPPHC 236 (4 March 2025)
The High Court condoned late filing of a leave-to-appeal application, but dismissed it because the applicant showed no reasonable prospects of success.
South African Legal Practice Council v Koma (2023/023597) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1171 (5 November 2024)
The High Court struck an advocate from the roll for taking direct instructions and client money without authority, failing to account, and showing unfitness to practise.
Mhlongo v Trustees for the Time Being of the Peter Neve Trust MT 1266/1996 being: Neves and Others (191/2024) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 65 (16 September 2024)
The High Court struck an urgent reconsideration application off the roll because it duplicated an earlier application struck for lack of urgency and raised no new developments.
Tankard v Old Mutual Wealth (2024/096858) [2024] ZAGPJHC 911 (10 September 2024)
An urgent application to compel disclosure of policy details and payment from an insurer was struck off the roll because urgency was not established.
Textton Property Fund Limited v Maxine Gunzenhauser and Company Incorporated and Others (2024/098805) [2024] ZAGPJHC 909 (10 September 2024)
The High Court struck an urgent eviction application from the roll because the applicant failed to show real urgency, and ordered costs against the applicant.
DSM Nutrition Products South Africa v O'ROURKE and Others (2024/077172) [2024] ZAGPJHC 983 (9 September 2024)
The High Court dismissed an application to reconsider or rescind an order striking an urgent application from the roll, with costs.
Explore more
