Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Zungane v Road Accident Fund (84985/17; 80916/15; 63951/21; 18482/22; 9321/22; 33973/21; 39494/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 694 (1 July 2025)
The court dismissed multiple RAF interlocutory applications as abusive attempts to convert trial matters into default judgments.
Redec Services (Pty) Ltd and Others v Kansai Plascon (Pty) Ltd ( Application for Leave to Apeal) (2020/29803) [2025] ZAGPJHC 537 (29 May 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against striking out the defendants’ defence for non-compliance with a court order.
Tuswa v Minister of Police and Another (2014/44510) [2025] ZAGPJHC 507 (22 May 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application to strike out a defence, finding the respondent had complied with Rule 35(3) by swearing the requested SAP 15 document did not exist.
Mokoka v JP Markets (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/013189) [2025] ZAGPJHC 463 (13 May 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application to strike out a defence under Rule 21(4), finding the notice and relief sought were procedurally defective and conflated with discovery issues.
N.B v R.B (38752/2016) [2025] ZAGPJHC 523 (29 April 2025)
The High Court compelled discovery under rule 35(7), rejecting a respondent’s attempt to withhold discovery pending an unfiled R100 000 payment claim.
Anglo American Emea Shared Services (Pty) Ltd and Another v Limpop Propellers CC and Others (899/2020) [2025] ZAGPJHC 147 (17 February 2025)
The High Court removed an application from the roll after the respondent failed to comply with a discovery order. The respondent was ordered to pay wasted costs on scale C.
Booysen v Ngwathe Local Municipality (2586/2020) [2024] ZAFSHC 414 (24 December 2024)
The respondent undertook in the pre-trial minute to provide specific information necessary for the preparation of trial, including its version of events, admissions, stance on documents, and witness list. Despite repeated requests and notices, the respondent failed to comply with its undertakings. The respondent's arguments that the questions amounted to requests for further particulars and that its intention to amend pleadings rendered the application moot are without merit. The respondent did not deny its undertakings and failed to provide any valid justification for non-compliance. The cou…
Source excerpt
Reckmann v Mabundla N.O. and Others (22734/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 370 (12 April 2024)
The High Court held that the shareholders agreement provided for expert determination, not arbitration, and dismissed a review of the expert’s rulings.
Phanyane v Premier of Gauteng Province and Another (14176/2017) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1141 (4 September 2023)
The High Court dealt with non-compliance with Rule 35(3) discovery notices and a prior order, and issued further pre-trial directives with a costs order.
Roseveare and Others v Simelane and Others (27833/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 838 (24 October 2022)
The High Court refused a third postponement, struck the first respondent’s defence, and allowed the applicants to proceed with relief over disputed share valuations.
Explore more
