Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Banking And Finance [2023] ZAGPPHC 651

Uys N.O. and Others v National Credit Regulator and Another (A58/2021)

Uys N.O. and Others v National Credit Regulator and Another (A58/2021) [2023] ZAGPPHC 651 (10 August 2023)

The High Court granted condonation, struck out new material in the answering affidavit, and allowed leave to appeal on a novel National Credit Act issue.

  • National Credit Act
  • Condonation
  • Simulated Transactions
  • Credit Agreement Definition
  • Striking Out Evidence
  • Strike-out
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2020] ZAGPPHC 622

Minister of State Security v Public Protector and Others (48521/19)

Minister of State Security v Public Protector and Others (48521/19) [2020] ZAGPPHC 622 (6 November 2020)

The court found that the Minister's concerns regarding national security were legitimate, as disclosure of the Inspector-General's Report would endanger SSA operatives and compromise intelligence methods. The fact that the report had been leaked and was in the public domain did not negate its classified status or render unauthorised possession lawful. The court held that the right of access to information is not absolute and may be limited in the interests of national security. The Minister's provision of a declassified, redacted version of the report was deemed a reasonable and justifiable l…

  • National Security
  • Access To Information
  • Open Justice
  • Classification Of Documents
  • Constitutional Limitation
  • Striking Out Evidence
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAGPJHC 216

Boldprops 1110 CC v Automatic Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another (07946/2016)

Boldprops 1110 CC v Automatic Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another (07946/2016) [2016] ZAGPJHC 216 (5 August 2016)

The High Court dismissed an application to strike out a franchise agreement annexed in reply, finding the respondents suffered no prejudice and knew the document.

  • Striking Out Evidence
  • Replying Affidavit
  • Prejudice
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 35
  • Costs Order
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2010] ZAWCHC 379

Burger and Another v Piognant Progress BK and Others (2473/2009)

Burger and Another v Piognant Progress BK and Others (2473/2009) [2010] ZAWCHC 379 (19 April 2010)

Leave to appeal was refused after the court found no reasonable prospect of success on the hearsay-evidence issue under section 3 of the Law of Evidence Amendment Act.

  • Admissibility Of Hearsay Evidence
  • Law Of Evidence Amendment Act Section 3
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Striking Out Evidence
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Hearsay-evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.