Mbatha v Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents Fund (29/96)
Mbatha v Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents Fund (29/96) [1997] ZASCA 25; 1997 (3) SA 713 (SCA); [1997] 2 All SA 483 (A); (26 March 1997)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Regulation 3(2)(a)(i), which requires claims against the Fund in unidentified vehicle cases to be lodged within two years, is intra vires s 6 of the Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents Fund Act 93 of 1989. The regulation gives effect to the Agreement and is not inconsistent with its provisions, even after subsequent amendments. The two-year time limit is reasonable and justified due to the increased risk of fraud and evidentiary difficulties in unidentified vehicle cases. The extended five-year prescription period under Article 57 of the Agreement applie…
Source excerpt
- Prescription Of Claims
- Ultra Vires Regulation
- Motor Vehicle Accident Fund
- Special Plea
- Third Party Insurance