Du Toit v Becket and Another (8687/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 56 (21 February 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
8687/2023
Judge
Holderness AJ
The court found that the statements published by the respondents in the Circular were defamatory of the applicant, damaging his reputation by suggesting misconduct, threats, and involvement in corruption. The respondents failed to discharge the onus of proving the truth of the statements or that their publication was for the public benefit or amounted to fair comment. The communications relied upon by the respondents did not substantiate the alleged threats or misconduct. The applicant established a clear right to protection of his reputation, a reasonable apprehension of future injury, and t…
Mulaudzi v Powell (494/2020) [2021] ZAWCHC 57 (26 March 2021)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
494/2020
Judge
Wille, J
Interlocutory discovery application in a defamation case: the court ordered discovery of board minutes, complaints, salary slips, and related pleadings.
Soyi v Daily Dispatch and Another (EL448/2015, ECD848/2015) [2018] ZAECELLC 9 (20 September 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
Case number
EL448/2015 / ECD848/2015
Judge
M.J. Lowe
Defamation claim over a Daily Dispatch article succeeded. The court rejected truth/public benefit and reasonable publication defences and awarded R20,000.
Citizen 1978 (Pty) Ltd v McBride (277/08) [2010] ZASCA 5; 2010 (4) SA 148 (SCA) ; [2010] 3 All SA 46 (SCA) (26 February 2010)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
277/08
Judges
Streicher, Mthiyane, Ponnan, Mhlantla, Tshiqi
The majority held that once amnesty has been granted under the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, the person is no longer considered to have committed the offence for which amnesty was granted, and any conviction is deemed not to have taken place. Therefore, branding the respondent a murderer and criminal in respect of those acts is false and defamatory. The defence of fair comment failed because the facts on which the comment was based were not true in law after amnesty. The respondent's action succeeded in respect of the defamatory allegations that he was unsuited to be app…
Source excerpt
Defamation
Fair Comment
Truth And Public Benefit
Promotion Of National Unity And Reconciliation Act
Roberts v Johncom Media Investments Limited (8677/04) [2007] ZAWCHC 1 (8 January 2007)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
8677/04
Judge
Weinkove
The court found that the statements complained of were either not defamatory or, if defamatory, were substantially true and published in the public interest. The plaintiff's conduct, particularly in relation to the SABC complaint, was obsessive and vindictive, justifying the characterisation in the article. The defendant acted reasonably in publishing the researched article, relying on a careful and meticulous journalist. The plaintiff's contradictory and unconvincing evidence undermined his case. The court held that the defendant was not negligent and that the publication was lawful. Regardi…
Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Another v Steere and Others [2005] ZAGPHC 368; 20/05/01 (5 August 2005)
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Case number
8520/05
Judge
Willis
Court refused an interim interdict to stop allegedly defamatory publications, finding no clear right and that the respondents’ undertakings were not tenders.