S v Mokoena (16/2022; A 1115/2020) [2022] ZAFSHC 107 (4 May 2022)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A 1115/2020
Judges
Molitsoane, Loubser
The High Court set aside part-heard criminal proceedings where the presiding magistrate was unavailable, holding the accused’s speedy-trial rights were prejudiced.
S v Stuurman; S v Khonze (22/2021) [2021] ZAWCHC 159; 2021 (2) SACR 559 (WCC) (18 August 2021)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
22/2021
Judges
M Pangarker, L Bozalek
The High Court held that where a regional magistrate who commenced criminal proceedings becomes unavailable due to appointment as a Judge, their jurisdiction in the matter ends and the proceedings are abortive and a nullity. There is no need for the High Court to set aside such proceedings; new proceedings may commence de novo before another regional magistrate. Section 304A of the Criminal Procedure Act does not apply as there was no conviction in either matter. The authorities cited confirm that the nullity arises ex lege and the High Court's intervention is unnecessary unless grave injusti…
The Free State High Court held that a magistrate who became permanently unavailable during trial could not continue, and the proceedings were set aside.