Paterson obo Nzwana v Road Accident Fund and Another (579/2009)
Paterson obo Nzwana v Road Accident Fund and Another (579/2009) [2012] ZAECPEHC 27; 2013 (2) SA 455 (ECP) (26 April 2012)
The court found that the first respondent's undertaking did not comply with the order of Revelas J dated 4 August 2010, as it included a proviso referencing Section 36 of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act and specified an inception date not agreed to by the parties or ordered by the court. This proviso constituted an impermissible qualification beyond the scope of Section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act. The court held that only the trial court is required to consider compensation already paid by the Compensation Commissioner, not the beneficiary when proving…
Source excerpt
- Road Accident Fund Act
- Undertaking For Future Medical Expenses
- Compliance With Court Order
- Punitive Costs Order