Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 770

Ramatsetse-Moloi v Shiremane and Others (2025-110223)

Ramatsetse-Moloi v Shiremane and Others (2025-110223) [2025] ZAGPPHC 770 (1 August 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll because the applicant failed to prove urgency, with unresolved executorship and marriage issues left for later proceedings.

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Customary Law Marriage
  • Letters Of Executorship
  • Striking From The Roll
  • Urgency-in-motion-proceedings
  • Customary-law-marriage
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 679

Hlatshwayo v First Rand Bank Limited and Others (27859/2015)

Hlatshwayo v First Rand Bank Limited and Others (27859/2015) [2025] ZAGPPHC 679 (8 July 2025)

The High Court granted leave to appeal against an order striking an urgent application from the roll in a property transfer dispute after a sale in execution.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Sale In Execution
  • Interim Interdict
  • Mortgage Enforcement
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAECMHC 62

Minister of Police v Qwela and Others (Reasons) (2025/088899)

Minister of Police v Qwela and Others (Reasons) (2025/088899) [2025] ZAECMHC 62 (8 July 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll, finding the Minister of Police had not shown genuine urgency and had delayed too long after attachment.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Rule 6 12 B
  • Rule 45a
  • Self Created Urgency
  • Stay-of-execution
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 678

Rapholo v Gauteng Liquor Board (2025/080377)

Rapholo v Gauteng Liquor Board (2025/080377) [2025] ZAGPPHC 678 (3 July 2025)

Urgent interim relief to continue liquor trading was refused. The court struck the application from the roll for lack of urgency and ordered costs against the applicant.

  • Liquor Licensing
  • Interim Interdict
  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Liquor-licensing
  • Urgent-applications
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 615

Merchant Commercial Finance 1 (Pty) Ltd t/a Merchant Factors v Hlantini Management and Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others (2025/061204)

Merchant Commercial Finance 1 (Pty) Ltd t/a Merchant Factors v Hlantini Management and Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others (2025/061204) [2025] ZAGPJHC 615 (18 June 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll, finding no urgency and holding the applicant failed to show substantial redress was unavailable in the ordinary course.

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Condonation
  • Reinstatement Of Appeal
  • Interim Interdict
  • Default Judgment
  • Execution Against Property
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 634

Violet Transport CC v Empedocles and Others (2025/073647)

Violet Transport CC v Empedocles and Others (2025/073647) [2025] ZAGPPHC 634 (10 June 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application off the roll, finding the alleged urgency was self-created and the applicant could seek redress in pending liquidation proceedings.

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Interdict
  • Declaratory Relief
  • Service Level Agreement
  • Corporate Liquidation
  • Urgency-in-motion-proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 522

Madiya v Peete and Another (061865/2025)

Madiya v Peete and Another (061865/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 522 (2 June 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application from the roll, finding the applicant had not shown real urgency for relief over alleged property encroachment.

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Property Encroachment
  • Planning Permission
  • Urgency-in-motion-proceedings
  • Property-encroachment
  • Planning-permission
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 604

Dumakude v Bidvest Bank Ltd and Another (054716/2025)

Dumakude v Bidvest Bank Ltd and Another (054716/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 604 (21 May 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application to unfreeze a bank account from the roll, finding the applicant failed to prove urgency under Rule 6(12).

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Freezing Of Bank Account
  • Party And Party Costs
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Urgency-in-motion-proceedings
  • Freezing-of-bank-account
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZALCD 14

National Prosecuting Authority v Taku and Others (2025/047062)

National Prosecuting Authority v Taku and Others (2025/047062) [2025] ZALCD 14 (10 April 2025)

The court found that urgency was justified due to the attachment of funds essential for witness protection and the prosecution of criminal cases. Applying the Plascon-Evans rule, the respondent's version was accepted in the absence of a replying affidavit. The review application was deemed withdrawn as the applicant failed to file the record within the prescribed period, and thus no review was pending. The writ could not be stayed pending a non-existent review application. The court held that the first respondent followed an incorrect procedure by seeking to enforce the reinstatement award th…

  • Enforcement Of Arbitration Award
  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • State Liability Act
  • Reinstatement And Back Pay
  • Stay Of Execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAMPMBHC 22

Ndlovu v Old Mutual Limited and Another (1908/2022)

Ndlovu v Old Mutual Limited and Another (1908/2022) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 22 (27 March 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent application off the roll, finding that the applicant had not shown real urgency and could obtain redress in due course.

  • Urgency In Motion Proceedings
  • Community Of Property
  • Executor Powers
  • Nullity Of Second Marriage
  • Urgency-in-motion-proceedings
  • Executor-powers
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.