Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
E.M.T v N.T (3672/2023) [2024] ZAECQBHC 60 (10 October 2024)
The court found the respondent in contempt of a Rule 43 maintenance order, but suspended the sentence. It also reduced interim maintenance from R15,000 to R7,500.
K.S v N.S (D1137/2021) [2023] ZAKZDHC 94 (1 December 2023)
The court found the application urgent due to the imminent risk of eviction and exclusion of the minor children from school. The respondent, having consented to the Rule 43 order while legally represented, was fully aware of his obligations. His failure to comply with rental, medical aid, and educational expenses was wilful and not justified by alleged financial constraints, especially given evidence of unnecessary and luxurious expenditures. The respondent did not provide sufficient financial disclosure to support his claims of inability to pay. The court declared the respondent in contempt…
Source excerpt
JJVW v NVW (2019/26732) [2022] ZAGPJHC 808 (18 October 2022)
The High Court varied a Rule 43 interim order in a divorce matter, suspending spousal maintenance pending financial disclosure and setting a new supervised contact regime.
C.D v J.H.D (10025/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 456 (27 June 2022)
The court found that the applicant's dismissal from employment at the respondent's company constituted a material change in circumstances, as she was previously denied maintenance on the basis of her employment and salary. The applicant demonstrated a genuine need for maintenance, having exhausted her financial resources and being unable to secure alternative employment. The respondent's financial position, including his assets and ability to make loans, indicated that he could afford the maintenance sought. The court accepted that the applicant's maintenance claim included reasonable expense…
Source excerpt
A.F v M.I.F (6664/2019) [2021] ZAWCHC 148 (19 July 2021)
The High Court partly varied a Rule 43 order in divorce proceedings, awarding the wife further interim legal-costs support and dismissing the husband’s counter-claim.
City of Johannesburg and Another v Matebese (26514/17) [2018] ZAGPJHC 703 (20 December 2018)
The High Court varied and supplemented an Anton Piller order to permit forensic inspection and copying of devices for evidence relevant to planned damages and review actions.
O v O (1385/2015) [2016] ZAFSHC 165 (29 September 2016)
The High Court varied an interim Rule 43 order, setting parental responsibilities, primary residence, contact rights, and monthly maintenance pending the main action.
Explore more
