Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 71

Steinhoff International Holdings Ltd v KAP International Holdings Ltd (101/LM/Nov11)

Steinhoff International Holdings Ltd v KAP International Holdings Ltd (101/LM/Nov11) [2012] ZACT 71; [2012] 2 CPLR 531 (CT) (15 August 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
101/LM/Nov11
Judges
Yasmin Carrim, Medi Mokuena, Takalani Madima

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Steinhoff’s acquisition of KAP, finding limited competition concerns, no foreclosure risk, and no public interest issues.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Allocation
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 61

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12)

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12) [2012] ZACT 61; [2012] 2 CPLR 516 (CT) (20 July 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
55/LM/May12
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andreas Wessels

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved PetroSA’s acquisition of offshore oil and gas assets from Pioneer SA and PSC, finding no substantial competition concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 50

Macsteel Services Centres SA (Pty) Ltd v Samson Property Investments SA (Pty) Ltd (52/LM/May12)

Macsteel Services Centres SA (Pty) Ltd v Samson Property Investments SA (Pty) Ltd (52/LM/May12) [2012] ZACT 50 (9 July 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
52/LM/May12
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andiswa Ndoni

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Macsteel’s acquisition of Samson Property Investments, finding no substantial competition or foreclosure concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Share Calculation
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-merger-analysis
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2009] ZACT 30

Crest Chemicals (Pty) Ltd v CH Chemicals (Pty) Ltd (131/LM/Dec08)

Crest Chemicals (Pty) Ltd v CH Chemicals (Pty) Ltd (131/LM/Dec08) [2009] ZACT 30 (12 May 2009)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
131/LM/Dec08
Judges
D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim

The Competition Tribunal approved Crest Chemicals’ acquisition of CH Chemicals’ chemicals distribution business, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Definition
  • Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 5

Protea Chemicals (A Division of the Omnia Group (Pty) Ltd) and Zetachem (Pty) Ltd (85/LM/Aug07)

Protea Chemicals (A Division of the Omnia Group (Pty) Ltd) and Zetachem (Pty) Ltd (85/LM/Aug07) [2008] ZACT 5 (17 January 2008)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
85/LM/Aug07
Judges
Y Carrim, U Bhoola, L Reyburn

The Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Protea Chemicals and Zetachem, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Market Definition
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2006] ZACT 14

Chemical Services Limited and Leochem (Pty) Ltd (109/LM/Nov05)

Chemical Services Limited and Leochem (Pty) Ltd (109/LM/Nov05) [2006] ZACT 14 (22 February 2006)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
109/LM/Nov05
Judges
Y Carrim, U Bhoola, M Mokuena

The Competition Tribunal approved Chemical Services’ acquisition of Leochem unconditionally, finding no substantial lessening of competition and limited public interest concerns.

  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Barriers To Entry
  • Public Interest Considerations
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.