fidele and another v cote divoire application 46 of 2019 application 48 of 2019 2019 afchpr 56 2 december 2019
- Citation
- fidele and another v cote divoire application 46 of 2019 application 48 of 2019 2019 afchpr 56 2 december 2019
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 2 December 2019
- Posture
- Application for Joinder of Cases / Preliminary Order
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 2 December 2019
- Posture
- Application for Joinder of Cases / Preliminary Order
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The facts, alleged violations, and reliefs sought in both applications are similar, the Respondent State is the same, and both applicants are represented by the same lawyer; therefore, joinder is appropriate for proper administration of justice under Rule 54.
Court disposition
joinder of cases ordered
Orders
- The joinder of Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 and related pleadings.
- The Applications shall henceforth be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 - Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle and Another v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire.
- This Order and the pleadings relating to the above referred Matters shall be served on all the Parties.
02
Material facts
Parties
Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle
ApplicantZakaria Sanogo
ApplicantRepublic of Côte d'Ivoire
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment Sentence: 20
03
Procedural history
Posture
Application for Joinder of Cases / Preliminary Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the joinder of Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 is appropriate in fact and in law
- 02
Whether the Applicants' rights to fair trial, effective remedy, access to counsel, justice and equality of arms were violated
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants allege violation of rights to fair trial, effective remedy, access to counsel, justice and equality of arms, based on similar facts and reliefs sought.
- Respondent
- No specific respondent argument recorded in the order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 54 of the Rules of Court
The Court may at any stage of the pleadings order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The facts, alleged violations, and reliefs sought in both applications are similar, the Respondent State is the same, and both applicants are represented by the same lawyer; therefore, joinder is appropriate for proper administration of justice under Rule 54.
Court disposition
joinder of cases ordered
- The joinder of Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 and related pleadings.
- The Applications shall henceforth be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 - Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle and Another v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire.
- This Order and the pleadings relating to the above referred Matters shall be served on all the Parties.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 2 December 2019
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 2 December 2019
AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES
MATTERS OF 1. AKA YAO BOSSIN FIDELE V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE APPLICATION No. 046/2019 AND 2. ZAKARIA SANOGO V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE APPLICATION No. 048/2019
ORDER FOR JOINDER OF CASES 2 DECEMBER 2019 The Court composed of: Ben KIOKO, Vice-President; Rafaâ BEN ACHOUR, Ângelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Thérèse MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Imani D. ABOUD – Judges; and Robert ENO, Registrar, In accordance with Article 22 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Protocol") and Rule 8(2) of the Rules of Court (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"), Judge Sylvain ORÉ, member of the Court and national of Côte d’Ivoire, did not hear the case. In the matters of:
AKA YAO BOSSIN FIDELE V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE APPLICATION No. 046/2019
AND
ZAKARIA SANOGO V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE APPLICATION No. 048/2019 After deliberation, Makes the following order: 1. Considering the Application No. 46/2019 dated 16 September 2019 received at the Registry of the Court on 2 October 2019 from Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State"); 2 2. Considering the Application No. 48/2019 dated 16 September 2019 received at the Registry of the Court on 2 October 2019, from Zakaria Sanogo (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") filed against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent State "); 3. Considering Rule 54 of the Rules which provides that " the Court may at any stage of the pleadings, either on its volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate in fact and in law'; 4. Considering that while the Applicants are different as stated above, they are represented by the same lawyer and the Applications are filed against the same Respondent State, which is the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire; 5. Considering that the facts supporting the Applications are similar as they originate from the trial of the Applicants and their sentencing to twenty (20) years imprisonment by the Abidjan-Plateau
Court of First Instance for theft and armed robbery, without having been represented by a lawyer, and that the said sentence was upheld by the Abidjan Court of Appeal; 6. Considering that in both cases, the Applicants allege that the Respondent State has violated their rights to a fair trial, effective remedy, access to a Counsel, to justice and equality of arms, as enshrined in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and that the reliefs sought are similar in nature; 7. Considering therefore that the facts supporting the Applications, the alleged violations and the prayers made are similar, and given that the identity of the Respondent State is the same; 8. As a consequence of the above, the joinder of cases and pleadings in relation to the above referenced Applications is appropriate in fact and in law and for the proper administration of justice, in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules; 3
OPERATIVE PART For these reasons, The Court Unanimously Orders: i. The joinder of the above referred Applications and related pleadings; ii. That henceforth the Applications be referred to as "Consolidated Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 - Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle and Another v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire;" iii. That consequent upon the joinder, this Order and the pleadings relating to the above referred Matters shall be served on all the Parties. Signed: Ben KIOKO, Vice President; Robert ENO, Registrar. Done at Zanzibar, this Second Day of December, Two Thousand and Nineteen, in English and French, the French text being authoritative. 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.