Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The African Court joined two Tanzanian applications challenging electoral laws, finding the matters involved the same respondent, similar issues, and similar relief.
The African Court joined two related applications concerning Elie Sandwidi’s dismissal and alleged human-rights violations against Burkina Faso and three other states.
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights ordered joinder of three related applications from Côte d’Ivoire because they arose from the same trial and raised similar claims.
The facts, alleged violations, and reliefs sought in both applications are similar, the Respondent State is the same, and both applicants are represented by the same lawyer; therefore, joinder is appropriate for proper administration of justice under Rule 54.
Source excerpt
The facts, alleged violations, and reliefs sought in the four applications are similar, all applicants are represented by the same lawyer, and the respondent is the same; therefore, joinder is appropriate for good administration of justice under Rule 54.
Source excerpt
The African Court ordered joinder of three related applications against Tanzania because they arose from the same criminal trial, appeal, and similar allegations.
The African Court ordered joinder of two similar applications against Côte d’Ivoire, finding common facts, claims, and reliefs justified consolidated proceedings.
The applications are based on similar facts, allege similar violations, seek similar reliefs, and are against the same respondent state; therefore, joinder is appropriate for the good administration of justice.
Source excerpt
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights ordered joinder of two related applications brought by XYZ against the Republic of Benin.
The facts, alleged violations, and requested reparations in both cases are similar, and the respondent is the same; therefore, joinder is appropriate for the proper administration of justice under Article 54 of the Rules of Court.
Source excerpt
Explore more
