Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19930806 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The evidence demonstrated that the appellant knowingly handled stolen property, and the sentence imposed was justified given the nature and prevalence of the offense.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of five years' imprisonment confirmed

02

Material facts

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Stolen Property: KES 500
  • Sentence Imposed: years 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that the trays he bought were not stolen and that the ones tendered as exhibits were new, unlike those he had purchased.
Respondent
The respondent contended that the appellant knowingly handled stolen property and that the evidence showed he was aware of the trays' origin.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Penal Code, Section 311(2)

    Handling stolen property requires knowledge or belief that the property is stolen.

  2. 02

    Judicial precedent and statutory guidelines

    Sentencing for handling stolen property should reflect the seriousness and prevalence of the offense.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The evidence demonstrated that the appellant knowingly handled stolen property, and the sentence imposed was justified given the nature and prevalence of the offense.

Obiter and limits

  • The appellant did not raise the issue of being an afterthought at trial, and the defense would not have been prejudiced if he had done so.
  • The offense is on the increase and sentences must deter those who break and steal by providing them with a ready market.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • sentence of five years' imprisonment confirmed

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 6 August 1993

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 6 August 1993

19930806 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

• I ' , ~-:1 l}jJIT..JD I.t].'LJJJLIC CJ. ~ rr.:.i;:"7"'../~·.1~Jf·: • r ••·"' ... . - - - - - ~ - · - • . • · - - - - - · • - · - - - - - · ~ , _ • - - l • vcrm.,1.,s .. • ' 0 TJ.,c c1::·:._:.0J.1r,::.t i•.l0:.It.:.:..GJD i'.i:~f.i.j.';L wc..s o:.·.c:_:,~ccl ,rit'..: :i.'Oociv:.:--;; r:,toJ.oa J?:..'o:;;crtr c/ s 311 ( 2) of t2 .c :L"'o11r,l Code L2. t: .o C.iGtrict oo·:.:.-rt oi ilcJ.e, d Kim.1.tuo Liwitcc":. Goi•m;r,:;:,3_ .'.~o; u:i_t;.:i:1 t:.~c CitJ, ,::xl ~-o:,ion. of Dci' cc ,.-;c.J.C'.c..r.1 t:..o r,:_,:::._)olJ.a.D.t ~·oo.::.ivocl C4 t:;:-r,ys r.11:.'zl::::od. 11T.oc., ~:J10:1clc::..~0r1 VCc1uo<l. c,t c:i:,o.50~000/c: ►- ... ,.... ",.., 110:...·o stolon o;1 t: .o ;:rl..:J:_t of 26 .D .~1 .. t::..10:f'ts l .r:-,c1 kl:on :c>lo.,co in t:cc po.at 2, scc-,-:::-it;;- ofiico:;:- of t7 .o fr,cto::-y 011.0 0 Jor('·r.1 Huda::.s,'J.c-, s:.'JJ:._-,cctcd t>.; t t::.o t::i.'.".',~TJ r.:i.'.1;/ ~.:a.vo. :.i:ol1.l1<.1 t>.ci:..• 1r2..: to 0 to Tc,;.15:c..nic Too. :Jlc;:.clo:.--G. J?::f2 :'3~1Gclf to::rt:'.ficcl tl:.c..t 1;;.:.011 :.o 101.:.:.1c~ t:.:o o..:;i:Jollc..11t with t: .. o t:.•c,~:-s t~·. o C.:J:..-::ol1~.._,~1t 2.c::-.ittccl.. t::.,·t t;ac:;r uc:,:c :.~io encl tLn.t ho ::...~cl 1:.iow) . t t:..or.1 l:.•0::.1 n 1:or uho }:cr,c.~ ~}::-o-..-~, ;,t t: .cD to Go:.,cr.;c-,:1.i. c.t s~lS o 100/=;; . r;r 1rit:.:.. Lcco:;.:-diD(; to t~:.c c:;_1:::-,eJ.lc,nt tho t11 :::-s >e

1Jo1..:,:J_1t 170:,:e oJ.c1 o:~cs ul:ilo t:.:o ones tonclo:.:.•et' co o::;:h_i.1Ji ts we~?o now. Ilic m-c;unc::t is t::r,t t~:.o t::;.:t0ys ho It is ale.:::.' L•oi:l the reco~c·c1. tL:t t;/.c ido~ 1•dscci 1J3- t~.o o,:._,pollr:nt on appo[!,l is C.l1 al'tc:.'t:,011.j.ct. I~o ::.1cvo1' :...·rJ.cccl it d tl.~c t::~:i.i"'.J., l;1 o.,riy . ooso r,s t::o t:::.--c.:·-c 1ro::.·c clcc..:;:-ly ~.1.,:d;:c c1 t::.o clofc"1ce woulc1 not Leve c.:v.:d.loc1 hin if :.io 1m;.1t o..l1cct1. c·.nd 1)0L:,:,l1t thc~.1 1rit>o·:ct 2,;_~,- inc1uil·y d t::o fo..cto:i.70 T:.10 oviclcmo clo~·:.-1;7 s:1.ows t>.c..t to 1Jon)r.t t: ·.o t:,:,.:-.ys lrnoui.nc, t>.ou to have r.10::-it. c,nc1 l'.B J..'oco:eCJJ 1 □ 0:rto:1cc t:·,.c cffc nee cf :;.•c ccivine stolc1'.! p1..01,c~.:>t;y- oai."'"'J'.'ios a 1:iroci.r.n.1.D sc,.:.toECO of tc:1 ;;,rcr. rs~ Tho c,:;:_:cJ.J.cnt a;~.icl not}.:i1'.(~ i:1 i:-J.itic;0tion of sentence. in].)osin::.; tl"'.O 0011t0:1cc.; of fivo ;rec.rs inp:,:·iso11Dont c,:::; tho offo:,.co is on tl,o i11c:..·oo..se c,;1c;_ it o:;.10O,""2c:c;co t:.1ose u}:.o b:..·cc~lc c-.m:. stcC'.l by prOvicli:;.1(; t: :en with 0, rec.. tl;'{ 1.1r;.:-kct, I t: .o:c·oio:-:e finc.l no 02,u:J-.; f o:;..' i11to~:fori11£ 1r:it;l t)o sentence o in the j)i~cscncc o:::' T .. 1.. i.:n:mre J01X:illl 6/rJ/1953

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code Section 311(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.