ERICK FRANCISCO
The High Court upheld Erick Francisco’s conviction for stealing a motorcycle, but reduced his five-year sentence to two years for being a first offender.
- Theft
- Criminal procedure
- Evidence
- Sentencing
- Criminal-appeal
- Criminal-procedure
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked
Tanzania Case Law
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
- Courts on this page
- 1 court collection
- Last checked
Search and filter Tanzania case law
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
sige
High Court criminal appeal over alleged maize theft dismissed. The court held the prosecution failed to prove the appellant planted the maize, and a claim of right defeated theft.
- Theft
- Claim of right
- Burden of proof
- Fair hearing
- Admissibility of evidence
- Criminal-law
Benedict Shauri v Chrispin Shauri
The High Court at Babati granted leave to appeal out of time after finding a prima facie illegality because the conviction may have arisen from a land dispute.
- Extension of time
- Jurisdiction
- Land dispute
- Theft
- Extension-of-time
- Land-disputes
JUDGMENT Faraji Saidi Haule vs
The contradictions between the charge sheet and evidence regarding chassis and engine numbers were minor and did not go to the root of the matter; the offence was proved beyond reasonable doubt and the appellant was able to defend himself; no injustice was caused by the variance.
Source excerpt
- Theft
- Proof beyond reasonable doubt
- Contradictions in evidence
- Charge sheet variance
Michael John v
The High Court allowed Michael John’s first criminal appeal, finding the theft conviction unsafe because the prosecution evidence and identification were unreliable.
- Theft
- Evidence evaluation
- Witness credibility
- Identification
- Criminal-appeal
- Evidence-evaluation
Joseph Judgement Final
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant stole the motorcycle, as evidenced by consistent witness testimony, documentary evidence, and the appellant's confession, while the appellant's defence was unsubstantiated and failed to raise reasonable doubt. The trial court's omission to consider the defence was cured by the appellate court's fresh evaluation, and the sentence was properly recorded.
Source excerpt
- Theft
- Criminal procedure
- Burden of proof
- Right to be heard
- Evaluation of evidence
79
The High Court allowed an appeal against armed robbery, finding the evidence proved theft but not the use or threat of violence with a weapon.
- Armed robbery
- Theft
- Evidence evaluation
- Conviction substitution
- Armed-robbery
- Criminal-appeal
PETER KAUSA SAMWELI
Existence of a land ownership dispute precludes criminal conviction for trespass and theft; criminal courts lack jurisdiction to resolve ownership; conviction, sentences, and compensation orders quashed.
Source excerpt
- Criminal trespass
- Theft
- Land ownership dispute
- Jurisdiction
- Procedure
Ferdinand Tinka
High Court criminal appeal allowed where theft charges over trees failed amid an unresolved land ownership dispute, with convictions and sentences quashed.
- Theft
- Land ownership dispute
- Criminal proceedings in context of unresolved civil dispute
- Land-ownership-dispute
- Criminal-appeal
Deogratius Ishengoma sc
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against a conviction for stealing electricity wire, holding that the seizure, chain of custody, and evidence were sufficient.
- Theft
- Chain of custody
- Evidence
- Search and seizure
- Burden of proof
- Variation in charge and evidence
Explore more