19930312 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19930312 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 12 March 1993
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 12 March 1993
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The conviction was upheld as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the evidence, which fully disclosed the offences charged. However, the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and were substituted with lesser concurrent sentences.
Court disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Convictions upheld
- Sentences set aside
- Substituted sentences of three years' imprisonment for theft and one year for escape, to run concurrently
02
Material facts
Parties
Appellant
Appellant Counsel: Mr. BondejiState
Respondent Counsel: State AttorneyAmounts and remedies
- Original Sentence for Theft: years 4
- Original Sentence for Escape: years 2
- Substituted Sentence for Theft: years 3
- Substituted Sentence for Escape: years 1
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the trial magistrate followed proper procedure in convicting the appellant on a plea of guilty after a witness had testified
- 02
Whether the evidence disclosed the offences charged
- 03
Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The procedure adopted by the trial magistrate was irregular as the conviction was based on evidence of a witness who had testified before the plea was changed to guilty, and the evidence did not disclose the offences charged.
- Respondent
- The conviction was proper as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the witness's evidence, and the evidence disclosed the offences charged.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
criminal procedure principles
When a plea of guilty is entered after evidence has been given, the court must be satisfied that the accused accepts the facts as stated and that the evidence discloses the offences charged.
- 02
sentencing principles
Sentences should not be manifestly excessive and should fit the circumstances of the case.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The conviction was upheld as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the evidence, which fully disclosed the offences charged. However, the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and were substituted with lesser concurrent sentences.
Court disposition
appeal allowed in part
- Convictions upheld
- Sentences set aside
- Substituted sentences of three years' imprisonment for theft and one year for escape, to run concurrently
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 12 March 1993
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 12 March 1993
·,J,' - 'ID ,. . t .. ti 1 C.:.J:I.ill1;,.1. l..i.~:iJI.L ~.iGa 167 CI' l~/::;2 · (i:ro:1 tl".co c10cisio:1 of the Ir.i.S:b±ict Cor::..·t of Kilo:i!.·oro Dist::ict .• d Ifr,k::.:,.•r,~ ooc-o,c;c.c-,oc oc ocoooe-e,oe~6 verst1J3 ... Tl~.e •O..l):1cllc,11t irc,s convictcc1. of ·sto; :i.L1c c/s 265 P oC o c..nc1 cscc,:;.1inc o··~··'-•r,""-·-- f:ro:1 lcwfulL o/; iif:.: .c. 7:c lT::~s then sc:.:to:~.cec1 to i,111i·ison.-.:10nt fo~ fr,rc ..yc::::..·s fo:.;• tl:o offc:.1cc of stoc,lii1c; n.ncl ·to .;bo yee:.rs fm: th::-,t of escr,:)il1C; se11to;:1ces to ~;c so:.::,-oa. consecutively~ :: :o ,:::,s 0{;1:'ievecl -:;y the s011tonoes nnd 11.ow ti.p:iec.ls to t; is cou::d o :G:;:-iefl3;, t:-o c,:::::..)oJ.12.:.'lt end c,::.:ot,i; 35 ot>c:i:'s ,;;c:;:-c locke(1 t.1."i.) c.t t;-e ILl.lo~.i.. c:..•o ;_· olico 0t::-,tio:1 lock-u.l"'l 01: <:;/ f:/f,~ o :iJ,ile t};.O:i:'O tl:.ey escc,:;:,oc., tcld.n.::; ui th tl1e::.1 G .'..,l':'.1 ~ .olonsinc; to t; .o :. olicoo Lrtcr so::lG of t::.e,·1, t:-.o:ft ( of tl:cc,"l,i.n) ,·:1c'- 0scc.:;.)inc.. T:,.c c,:..,:..,on::.·.at wc.s ct2.rced clo;:10 in t].:.is .oc.oo. :..£tor tlle t:~:'.c:.l cm.1enocd nncl c.fta:: 0:10 v:i tness tcstifiocl 1.e ( the c:;_~:::c-elJ.r:.nt) deciC:oc'. to o:-.::-,ncc his :,lee.. D:-0:1 1\10t c,1.,il ty" to '\:;u:i.J.t:-. r; T'.;.:-.e t:.:-icl :-:icc,ist:.:~:to c;.ccc:;,tc0. tl-.o :;~le~: c,:1t":. u::.\011 it, corr-rictecl t:
.c c.:;.i:)clJrnto . E:e notocl t:.r..t tLc ev:!.fc:1.cc of tl.o witness ul:o h['.c:. t08ti.fied uc.o to ~;o t~kcn c,s tl .o f,_--,ct~ of t1'.o cc.so, so:.,.t Gi.100 y 1"Jr. 0 u0D().'.J ,.., n t C:,t G ,... •1• ~ 1 cr.:cnou.~ ,:, 'tt o:::.10j7' f or tl10 :.\.Oj_)U:.:; .' 1 1J.C · iTC,S .,..,,..1.· 't) t>o vicu t::,ct t::.o ::_Ii.'occcltu-e c,do:;_)t~c1.. ~.::z:· t: :o t:.:ia.1 :in.c;ist:.:-c..to in t:.is c:i.se u::,s 1r.::-011c.; c,nc tole -;;::.is cou1:'t t::.c:t !10 ~rc-,s t: .cI"0fo:;.~o not six;_,:;..10:ctinc the a:i.·,:;_;0llr,irt 1 s convict:.011., ~:e S£:id it ,17.'.s ~r.;:-o~,~~ fo..- t}'.o t:dc,1 coii::.·t to t·ect t;·.c cvic~onco of t:20 ri t;1oss -:rho : .'."'(.,_ testified D-s tl:0 fl'.cts of t!10 oc..z0, CSJ.)OC:i.~ll;r 1:oc:..:u,so t:;c,t. 0tric1..cncc (iC not clisclosc U.o offences cJ c:.;..':' ;ed., Scccnc'-1:-, Hr. 3cmC)2.ji sv.1:.: u ttocl., t: 0.c mr:i.ecno-e l@J! n@t c.cOCIJtod ......_., . ' l L ... ,. .,_ . (' con,:iction. ..... _..-:"1-> }:' ' i ,i 2. ii ' 1;y t: .o c.:,:,pellc.nt c,s t:.::·.a. rt.·,, 8on(,l:ji 112n of' the view thnt tI:to eY1iire ::_1rocoC:.m·e c..co1;tcd ;;~:- t; .o t:rio..l J,.c;ist.•c,to follo:ri;::.c e, ::_:la,, of' c;t:.il t·;-- 1Jy [',~1 C..OCL1.8oc1 I)CI'SOi1 W<'.'.S so i:;_•::. q<;_ulcr 0 tl ..:.t t: 0 C0iTviotion of th0 C,-::_-,:-i70JJ.cmt COiTvictione , c.cc_·.'.Sec:. 1s ovm 1-~o:.:-c.s •. 'T2)en t:10 )J.ee, is 0:;.-ito:.'ocL
~-'3~ tl:.9 court, L\t~on it ( t::e cm,1_:,:t) ::oin:_:, s:~t::.ofiecl t];2.t it :;.s c,~: l'.j.1ec.:_v.i-11oco.l j_jleo. of n,il t;r • .. 7ollo~-rinc t].isr t~•o. ::_-i:.-c::ieouto:r is co.J.J.oc. ;·.:._·:0:1 to strtc t].:.o frctc of , co~;.,rictce. of tl-:.o 0fI-o:.--:-c0 c: ..::-.:~·.;ed o;.1 :. is o~::.: ::;leu of C,l..'.:i.l ty to it. ,1i; tho instt,:.;,,.t oo..sc ,- cs s:.c,m t'. c , .::_;::_)ollr-nt cJ:.cn;,ec liis :::loo. c,ft'o::,:.• -t:;__._o e-.r:U:o;,,.cc of o. 1-~:i.tn0ss }-.~,c:. ·; 00;.1 :,i7en b1c~ t}.:o ::ir..cist::,,rto t:.:e~tea. tl·+e ovic'.o;:100 GJ nt;.~e fc,cts of.' t:. e c:-:De-;, ~ The :.-:'oco~cc1. docs i1ot s'.·.o,r tJ: ,t tho ,,::_;i1cJ.J.~:;.,.t t2.:.on t,cce:;tcc: r;t:-.o :f:--,ctsi; to ·:..-c co:i."':::'cct o I s-t-.2iotly b.c;l10r0 to t: .c 001":":.'cct :i_::I'oce{;_,:,:,,o ,;;'. :Lc~i L\;_:,,::_)lies W{iGi'l D- :;;le:, of c,·d.1 t:, is :::;ivon. Did. t:,;_is :... 0nc:e::; tLc :,::ococtinc.,s so li'1:'e(,u.1G.:..• 0 c:.s to jtistif:, tl:.ei;.~ 1.:einc., c_:_:. _2,z:.~ec:? 0 I t;:.,i;.-1.k ;.1ot, .:'..S sto.tec:, tl:e n::.?;:-eJ.lci.nt ·:..ilo:·.t-:ec. cuilty ;ji.;;,st cl'tc:e tho :iitxJeso ·:~::o tGctifioc. finished tootif;yi.ngg t2"e 2,_:)yeJ.ln.nt ::iu.st ;~c,-.;·e ut~OrEltooa. t~:,.e st-.concth of that ovic~enoe, hence }Jis cllnnc;e of :;_)lc.'.:1s ~ I ,::iJ. sc t:;_sf'icc:. t::,2. t tL.0 evidence fully discloses ~ .. oth the o:ffcaces
ctni~.c;edo Lcco::·tlinc;ly I do not a.c;:-ee n:i_t:-'. l'U', f-lone:;t:ji t:1c.t tl,0 corr.riot ions sLc.1.:.lc-:. ~:o r!t~sl:,0c.o They rei:1n.L1 sc:..·vcc1 consccutivel;-;'. Docoi1c"c13r 9 th'3 ,-,:..-:;..,o.:i.]_;-:~1t :,ler:ctec. o,:i.lty ~ T: . :i.s c, s;. or0.c1 Lo.ve sc::..,..ved n.i:z:. :oint in aiti:_;'."'..t::.o,.·.. , :C:'0:,7 tl;cse c:.~:c-ve :.·er-,c.o;:1s t~. :o sc~1.tcnces yicosoc1,. .. ~- t~.,_e tric,1 cot:.'t uc:.~e :1c.nifestJ.;y- OX(iecmiw. I a.J.J_mr tl:.e c..:,_,::;,oc-1 --::1c1 g_unsl.:. nnc~ set r:s:LC.o t:. e sentences i ·:i_)OSocl r.21 t;_ ,e '; a:._,~;eJ.J.::-,~1t tcc.etl.c:.- ·.:--:'.t:. tLo o.::·c~e:c t' rt t:.e contcnccs ~-o sc:,:vcc. OOl'.ltmCL.'- tit'Ol7. I su:~stj_tc,_to t>o:.:,,cfor. tlc sc~yi;c;,.ccs of th:;,.•·oo 3·c2.rs' ii.l;):,.'ison,- :xmt 0., • • • /3 .. • J - 3 :1ent fo.,: tJ:.o o:ff'c;~-cc o2 steclin;_ ( ccm1t~.) 2.;.K 0no yo:::c 1s L1:;:irj_son.:.1cnt fo~ t;·..c.t of oscr..:;:;i,,:, f.:..:o;:1 l.1-:f\:J. c\'.Gtoc.1..;; ( 001.:nt 2) o.,~').:c'. t~·-.cso sc;.:tc::.100s 2,j_'O to ~)0 SO.i'VOcl co..10-":}:.'Ci1t1y 0 Cki,:-n.,.;:,:i, 7 Stc'-to 1...tto:..r::.oz·, fo:..· tho :J.c:;_,u.~:lic • ..i..cCL'..Sod - o.1;~ont, c.~oos 1.1ot wisL to ~:c :..--:.. o □ c ..1t. Jtld[;w.cnt dt:liYC:'OG.o
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.