Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19930312 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The conviction was upheld as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the evidence, which fully disclosed the offences charged. However, the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and were substituted with lesser concurrent sentences.

Court disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Convictions upheld
  • Sentences set aside
  • Substituted sentences of three years' imprisonment for theft and one year for escape, to run concurrently

02

Material facts

Parties

Appellant

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Bondeji

State

Respondent Counsel: State Attorney

Amounts and remedies

  • Original Sentence for Theft: years 4
  • Original Sentence for Escape: years 2
  • Substituted Sentence for Theft: years 3
  • Substituted Sentence for Escape: years 1

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The procedure adopted by the trial magistrate was irregular as the conviction was based on evidence of a witness who had testified before the plea was changed to guilty, and the evidence did not disclose the offences charged.
Respondent
The conviction was proper as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the witness's evidence, and the evidence disclosed the offences charged.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    criminal procedure principles

    When a plea of guilty is entered after evidence has been given, the court must be satisfied that the accused accepts the facts as stated and that the evidence discloses the offences charged.

  2. 02

    sentencing principles

    Sentences should not be manifestly excessive and should fit the circumstances of the case.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The conviction was upheld as the appellant changed his plea to guilty after hearing the evidence, which fully disclosed the offences charged. However, the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive and were substituted with lesser concurrent sentences.

Court disposition

appeal allowed in part

  • Convictions upheld
  • Sentences set aside
  • Substituted sentences of three years' imprisonment for theft and one year for escape, to run concurrently

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 12 March 1993

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 12 March 1993

19930312 TZHC Dar es Salaam

·,J,' - 'ID ,. . t .. ti 1 C.:.J:I.ill1;,.1. l..i.~:iJI.L ~.iGa 167 CI' l~/::;2 · (i:ro:1 tl".co c10cisio:1 of the Ir.i.S:b±ict Cor::..·t of Kilo:i!.·oro Dist::ict .• d Ifr,k::.:,.•r,~ ooc-o,c;c.c-,oc oc ocoooe-e,oe~6 verst1J3 ... Tl~.e •O..l):1cllc,11t irc,s convictcc1. of ·sto; :i.L1c c/s 265 P oC o c..nc1 cscc,:;.1inc o··~··'-•r,""-·-- f:ro:1 lcwfulL o/; iif:.: .c. 7:c lT::~s then sc:.:to:~.cec1 to i,111i·ison.-.:10nt fo~ fr,rc ..yc::::..·s fo:.;• tl:o offc:.1cc of stoc,lii1c; n.ncl ·to .;bo yee:.rs fm: th::-,t of escr,:)il1C; se11to;:1ces to ~;c so:.::,-oa. consecutively~ :: :o ,:::,s 0{;1:'ievecl -:;y the s011tonoes nnd 11.ow ti.p:iec.ls to t; is cou::d o :G:;:-iefl3;, t:-o c,:::::..)oJ.12.:.'lt end c,::.:ot,i; 35 ot>c:i:'s ,;;c:;:-c locke(1 t.1."i.) c.t t;-e ILl.lo~.i.. c:..•o ;_· olico 0t::-,tio:1 lock-u.l"'l 01: <:;/ f:/f,~ o :iJ,ile t};.O:i:'O tl:.ey escc,:;:,oc., tcld.n.::; ui th tl1e::.1 G .'..,l':'.1 ~ .olonsinc; to t; .o :. olicoo Lrtcr so::lG of t::.e,·1, t:-.o:ft ( of tl:cc,"l,i.n) ,·:1c'- 0scc.:;.)inc.. T:,.c c,:..,:..,on::.·.at wc.s ct2.rced clo;:10 in t].:.is .oc.oo. :..£tor tlle t:~:'.c:.l cm.1enocd nncl c.fta:: 0:10 v:i tness tcstifiocl 1.e ( the c:;_~:::c-elJ.r:.nt) deciC:oc'. to o:-.::-,ncc his :,lee.. D:-0:1 1\10t c,1.,il ty" to '\:;u:i.J.t:-. r; T'.;.:-.e t:.:-icl :-:icc,ist:.:~:to c;.ccc:;,tc0. tl-.o :;~le~: c,:1t":. u::.\011 it, corr-rictecl t:

.c c.:;.i:)clJrnto . E:e notocl t:.r..t tLc ev:!.fc:1.cc of tl.o witness ul:o h['.c:. t08ti.fied uc.o to ~;o t~kcn c,s tl .o f,_--,ct~ of t1'.o cc.so, so:.,.t Gi.100 y 1"Jr. 0 u0D().'.J ,.., n t C:,t G ,... •1• ~ 1 cr.:cnou.~ ,:, 'tt o:::.10j7' f or tl10 :.\.Oj_)U:.:; .' 1 1J.C · iTC,S .,..,,..1.· 't) t>o vicu t::,ct t::.o ::_Ii.'occcltu-e c,do:;_)t~c1.. ~.::z:· t: :o t:.:ia.1 :in.c;ist:.:-c..to in t:.is c:i.se u::,s 1r.::-011c.; c,nc tole -;;::.is cou1:'t t::.c:t !10 ~rc-,s t: .cI"0fo:;.~o not six;_,:;..10:ctinc the a:i.·,:;_;0llr,irt 1 s convict:.011., ~:e S£:id it ,17.'.s ~r.;:-o~,~~ fo..- t}'.o t:dc,1 coii::.·t to t·ect t;·.c cvic~onco of t:20 ri t;1oss -:rho : .'."'(.,_ testified D-s tl:0 fl'.cts of t!10 oc..z0, CSJ.)OC:i.~ll;r 1:oc:..:u,so t:;c,t. 0tric1..cncc (iC not clisclosc U.o offences cJ c:.;..':' ;ed., Scccnc'-1:-, Hr. 3cmC)2.ji sv.1:.: u ttocl., t: 0.c mr:i.ecno-e l@J! n@t c.cOCIJtod ......_., . ' l L ... ,. .,_ . (' con,:iction. ..... _..-:"1-> }:' ' i ,i 2. ii ' 1;y t: .o c.:,:,pellc.nt c,s t:.::·.a. rt.·,, 8on(,l:ji 112n of' the view thnt tI:to eY1iire ::_1rocoC:.m·e c..co1;tcd ;;~:- t; .o t:rio..l J,.c;ist.•c,to follo:ri;::.c e, ::_:la,, of' c;t:.il t·;-- 1Jy [',~1 C..OCL1.8oc1 I)CI'SOi1 W<'.'.S so i:;_•::. q<;_ulcr 0 tl ..:.t t: 0 C0iTviotion of th0 C,-::_-,:-i70JJ.cmt COiTvictione , c.cc_·.'.Sec:. 1s ovm 1-~o:.:-c.s •. 'T2)en t:10 )J.ee, is 0:;.-ito:.'ocL

~-'3~ tl:.9 court, L\t~on it ( t::e cm,1_:,:t) ::oin:_:, s:~t::.ofiecl t];2.t it :;.s c,~: l'.j.1ec.:_v.i-11oco.l j_jleo. of n,il t;r • .. 7ollo~-rinc t].isr t~•o. ::_-i:.-c::ieouto:r is co.J.J.oc. ;·.:._·:0:1 to strtc t].:.o frctc of , co~;.,rictce. of tl-:.o 0fI-o:.--:-c0 c: ..::-.:~·.;ed o;.1 :. is o~::.: ::;leu of C,l..'.:i.l ty to it. ,1i; tho instt,:.;,,.t oo..sc ,- cs s:.c,m t'. c , .::_;::_)ollr-nt cJ:.cn;,ec liis :::loo. c,ft'o::,:.• -t:;__._o e-.r:U:o;,,.cc of o. 1-~:i.tn0ss }-.~,c:. ·; 00;.1 :,i7en b1c~ t}.:o ::ir..cist::,,rto t:.:e~tea. tl·+e ovic'.o;:100 GJ nt;.~e fc,cts of.' t:. e c:-:De-;, ~ The :.-:'oco~cc1. docs i1ot s'.·.o,r tJ: ,t tho ,,::_;i1cJ.J.~:;.,.t t2.:.on t,cce:;tcc: r;t:-.o :f:--,ctsi; to ·:..-c co:i."':::'cct o I s-t-.2iotly b.c;l10r0 to t: .c 001":":.'cct :i_::I'oce{;_,:,:,,o ,;;'. :Lc~i L\;_:,,::_)lies W{iGi'l D- :;;le:, of c,·d.1 t:, is :::;ivon. Did. t:,;_is :... 0nc:e::; tLc :,::ococtinc.,s so li'1:'e(,u.1G.:..• 0 c:.s to jtistif:, tl:.ei;.~ 1.:einc., c_:_:. _2,z:.~ec:? 0 I t;:.,i;.-1.k ;.1ot, .:'..S sto.tec:, tl:e n::.?;:-eJ.lci.nt ·:..ilo:·.t-:ec. cuilty ;ji.;;,st cl'tc:e tho :iitxJeso ·:~::o tGctifioc. finished tootif;yi.ngg t2"e 2,_:)yeJ.ln.nt ::iu.st ;~c,-.;·e ut~OrEltooa. t~:,.e st-.concth of that ovic~enoe, hence }Jis cllnnc;e of :;_)lc.'.:1s ~ I ,::iJ. sc t:;_sf'icc:. t::,2. t tL.0 evidence fully discloses ~ .. oth the o:ffcaces

ctni~.c;edo Lcco::·tlinc;ly I do not a.c;:-ee n:i_t:-'. l'U', f-lone:;t:ji t:1c.t tl,0 corr.riot ions sLc.1.:.lc-:. ~:o r!t~sl:,0c.o They rei:1n.L1 sc:..·vcc1 consccutivel;-;'. Docoi1c"c13r 9 th'3 ,-,:..-:;..,o.:i.]_;-:~1t :,ler:ctec. o,:i.lty ~ T: . :i.s c, s;. or0.c1 Lo.ve sc::..,..ved n.i:z:. :oint in aiti:_;'."'..t::.o,.·.. , :C:'0:,7 tl;cse c:.~:c-ve :.·er-,c.o;:1s t~. :o sc~1.tcnces yicosoc1,. .. ~- t~.,_e tric,1 cot:.'t uc:.~e :1c.nifestJ.;y- OX(iecmiw. I a.J.J_mr tl:.e c..:,_,::;,oc-1 --::1c1 g_unsl.:. nnc~ set r:s:LC.o t:. e sentences i ·:i_)OSocl r.21 t;_ ,e '; a:._,~;eJ.J.::-,~1t tcc.etl.c:.- ·.:--:'.t:. tLo o.::·c~e:c t' rt t:.e contcnccs ~-o sc:,:vcc. OOl'.ltmCL.'- tit'Ol7. I su:~stj_tc,_to t>o:.:,,cfor. tlc sc~yi;c;,.ccs of th:;,.•·oo 3·c2.rs' ii.l;):,.'ison,- :xmt 0., • • • /3 .. • J - 3 :1ent fo.,: tJ:.o o:ff'c;~-cc o2 steclin;_ ( ccm1t~.) 2.;.K 0no yo:::c 1s L1:;:irj_son.:.1cnt fo~ t;·..c.t of oscr..:;:;i,,:, f.:..:o;:1 l.1-:f\:J. c\'.Gtoc.1..;; ( 001.:nt 2) o.,~').:c'. t~·-.cso sc;.:tc::.100s 2,j_'O to ~)0 SO.i'VOcl co..10-":}:.'Ci1t1y 0 Cki,:-n.,.;:,:i, 7 Stc'-to 1...tto:..r::.oz·, fo:..· tho :J.c:;_,u.~:lic • ..i..cCL'..Sod - o.1;~ont, c.~oos 1.1ot wisL to ~:c :..--:.. o □ c ..1t. Jtld[;w.cnt dt:liYC:'OG.o

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 265

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.