sidiki et outros c republique du cote divoire requete n 0472019 requete n 0512019 requete n 0532019 requetes jointes nos 0282019 requetes jointes nos 0302019 requ
- Citation
- sidiki et outros c republique du cote divoire requete n 0472019 requete n 0512019 requete n 0532019 requetes jointes nos 0282019 requetes jointes nos 0302019 requ
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2019
- Posture
- Joinder of Applications / Interlocutory Order
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2019
- Posture
- Joinder of Applications / Interlocutory Order
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applications concern similar facts, alleged violations, and measures requested against the same respondent state, justifying joinder for proper administration of justice under Rule 54.
Court disposition
joinder of cases ordered
Orders
- Joinder of Applications No. 047/2019, 051/2019, 053/2019 with Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019, Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
- Henceforth, the applications shall be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019, 047/2019, 051/2019 and 053/2019 - Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
- This order and related pleadings shall be served on all parties.
02
Material facts
Parties
Diomande Aboubakar Sidiki
ApplicantTraore Aboulaye
ApplicantAdae Tano Alain Christian
ApplicantFea Charles and Others
ApplicantRepublic of Cote d'Ivoire
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Joinder of Applications / Interlocutory Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applications should be joined due to similarity of facts, alleged violations, and respondent state
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants seek joinder of their cases due to similar facts, alleged violations, and measures requested against the same respondent state.
- Respondent
- No specific respondent argument recorded in the order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 54 of the Rules of Court
The Court may at any stage of the pleadings order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applications concern similar facts, alleged violations, and measures requested against the same respondent state, justifying joinder for proper administration of justice under Rule 54.
Court disposition
joinder of cases ordered
- Joinder of Applications No. 047/2019, 051/2019, 053/2019 with Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019, Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
- Henceforth, the applications shall be referred to as Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019, 047/2019, 051/2019 and 053/2019 - Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
- This order and related pleadings shall be served on all parties.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 1 January 2019
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 1 January 2019
i 000N0 t r6'\ AFRICAN UNION UNIoN AFRICAINE I .+,i!r .rl=fltr \J t **) i*, E urutAo arRrcnrun AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPTES' RIGHTS
COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE THOMME ET DES PEUPLES
AFFAIRES 1. DIOMANDE ABOUBAKAR SIDIKI c. REPUBLTeUE DE c6re D'rvorRE neouEre N' 047/2019 D++ t aotq ET oc tlrl aott 2. TRAORE ABOULAYE ooo+s7)Bs C ooo l+l+o- c. REPUBLTeUE DE cOre D'rvorRE neouEre N'os1/2019 ET 3. ADAE TANO ALAIN CHRISTIAN c. REPUBLTeUE DE cOre D'rvorRE neouErE N" 053/2019 ET REQUETES JOINTES Nos. 02812019,030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019 - FEA cHARLES ET AUTRES c. nEpueLreuE oe c6re D'lvotRE ORDONNANCE PORTANT JONCTION D'INSTANCES 2 DECEMBERE 2019 I I The Gourt composed of Ben KIOKO, Vice President, Rafad BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Therese MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOUIA,. Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella L ANUKAM, lmani D. ABOUD, Judges; and Robert ENO, Regbtrar 000 4 3I Pursuant to article 22 of the Protocol on the African Charter on Human and Peopbs' Rights on the establishment of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereafter refened to as the 'Protocol") and Rule 8(2) of the Rules of Court (hereafter refened to as the "Rules") Judge Sylvain ORE of lvorian nationality did not hear the case. ln the matters DIOMANDE ABOUBAKAR SIDIK! v.
REPUBLIC OF COTE DIVOIRE APPLICATION No. 047/2019
AND
TRAOREABOULAYE v. REPUBLIC OF COTE D'MOIRE APPLICATION No. 051/2019
AND
ADAE TANO ALAIN CHRISTIAN v. COTE D'IVOIRE APPLICATTON No. 053/2019 AND JOINT APPLICAT|ON NO. 028t2019, 030/2019, 031/2019, 033/2019 _ FEA CHARLES AND OTHERS V. REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE ,rrru I After deliberations, 00043I Makes the follorruing order 1 Considering the Application dated 16 September 2019, received at the'Registry of the Court on 2 October 2019, from Diomande Aboubakar Sidiki (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") against the Republic of COte d'lvoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State") and registered as Application No. 04712019 2 Considering the Application dated 16 September 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on 11 October 2019, from Traore Aboulaye (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") against the Republic of COte d'lvoire (hereinafter referred to as " the respondent State") and registered as Application No. 05112019; 3 ConsideringtheApplicationdated 16 September2Ol9, received atthe Registryof the Court on 11 October 2019, from Adae Tano Alain Christian (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") against the Republic of C6te d'lvoire (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent State") and registered as Application No. 053/2019; 4 Considering the joinder of cases and pleadings in Applications Nos. 02812019, 030/2019, 03112019 and 033/2019, - Fea Charles and others v. Republic of Cdte d'lvoire made by the Court by an Order
of 26 September 2019; 5 Considering Rule 54 of the Rules which provides that "the Court may at any stage of the pleadings either on its own volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law." 6. Considering that the facts in support of the Applications referenced above, the alleged violations and the measures requested are similar, the Respondent State being the same and for the same reasons as those which justified the joinder of proceedings concerning Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/2019,03112019,033/2019, Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'lvoire; 7. As a consequence of the above, , the joinder of cases and pleadings in relation to the above-referenced Applications is appropriate in fact and in law and for the proper administration of justice, in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules; 311!.lgr: ,
OPERATIVE PART *a043'i For these reasons, The Court, Unanimously Orders The joinder of cases and pleadings in Applications No. 04712019 Diomande Aboubakar Sidikiv. Republic of Cote d'lvoire, No. 051/2019 Traore Aboulaye v. Republic of Cdte d'lvoire and No. 05312019 Adae Tano Alain Christian v. Republic of C6te d'lvoire with those in Consolidated Applications Nos. 02812019, 030/2019, 03112019, 033/2019, Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cdte d'lvoirei il That henceforth the Applications be referred to as "Consolidated Applications Nos. 028/2019, 030/20'19, 031/2019, 03312019,04712019,051t2019 and 053 / 2019 - Fea Charles and Others v. Republic of Cote d'lvoire." ilt That consequent upon the joinder, this Order and the pleadings related to the above referred matters shall be served on allthe Parties. Signed Ben KIOKO, Vice President; ilt "l ,r; Robert ENO, Registrar .) Done alZanzibar, this Second Day of Decem rTvventy Ni in French, the French text being authoritative. 4lilage
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.