Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19881208 TZCA Dar es Salaam3 1

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defence proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent was insane at the time of the attack, and the trial court was correct in finding her not guilty by reason of insanity under section 219(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.

02

Material facts

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Bilaro

Frida w/o Philipu

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Rweyemamu

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Acquittal in High Court

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The trial court erred in disregarding the psychiatric report, which was more relevant to the respondent's mental state at the material time than the evidence of the physician.
Respondent
The respondent was insane at the time of the attack, as supported by direct evidence and the testimony of Dr. Mtero regarding the effects of acute malaria.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general principles of criminal law and Criminal Procedure Act, section 219(2)

    Medical evidence is opinion evidence and must be tested before acceptance; the defence of insanity must be proved on a balance of probabilities.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defence proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent was insane at the time of the attack, and the trial court was correct in finding her not guilty by reason of insanity under section 219(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Obiter and limits

  • It is not necessary to be a psychiatrist to know the mental effects of certain types of malaria.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • The appeal is dismissed.

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 8 December 1988

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 8 December 1988

19881208 TZCA Dar es Salaam3 1

' .. ' 1+-l c bs~ ( C0:."1:..M: Ny:,,lr-.,li 2 C.J •• Mcl~".'.f.le, J J, •.. :~ft.cl, 0n<'-r, J ef. •) . I CRD1IN1.L 1'.PPELL NO o 22 PP 1988 'I:-.2. DiiIBCTOR OF PUBLIC PH.OSECUTIOJJS •••• •. • • • . • • • •, • • •• •• .".PPELIJJ:JT 1 A1ffi 7..'UD/. ITIILIPO •• •• ., ••••• , •••••••••• ,, •• , • , •• , •·•., •, • •• • RESP01l])I:l'TT (Jp:,cr-.l. i'ron tl:o acquittn.l of t:,c ~i(:;:.J. Cuurt of T:-:nzMie. at Mw~Z<',) (r.m;.LUG/.NYL.' J.) Do.tc<l 14th DoccrJbor, ·1987 ill CrirJ:i.n..-u Soeoions C::i,so No 1 111 of 1985 ~- .. rif:• ! . JUDGfil·IENT 01:' 'Im: COUilT I II t·t< 'tc "T\ ; : .. IffI..T,:~LI C.J.: j I t-, \ tjl'r~~;,_ . I Tl.lo respondent, Fricl.:i. w o Philipu, W"'S ch:-:rgocl in: tt.e ITi{jll Court on . ('.: ff\; circu.i t·:.nt Ifukobc?. ·wtth ·t..:e ofi'onco of nuru.or,.. ----- ; contrr-.ry' _to section 196 o-f tho . ·t.t} (,;~. Pc,1:-1.l Cello J but wns found not @}.il ty by- rc:i..son of ins,:i..n_i ty und.er the provisiona I ·: i tfl j',' o:: soction 219 eub-eoction 2 of t!w Cril:,inn.l Proeocluro ~'I.ct, 1985 :;,.nc.l w::is coL1r.1i ttod t •· .to prison ~-"'S •.a. crinin"l lu.11"'·\;ic J,.· _j ,_ " 'Ille Director of I\iblic Prosocutions, [., f h..,roinc.ft0r cr:llctl. the, D.i: .P •, wns :IC[';ricvocl 1:y ti.1is decision of tlle IIic;1 Court, ! l i. • ,., hc11cc ttis c.ppo~l to ~:is court. Mr. Bilr.ro, le:-.rnod Sfato li.ttomoy, c>.ppo-u-od H· ..,.. ~ tuo •7

f':Jf - D.P .P. whore<'..S Mr. Rweyor.i.'.'.Cilll, lor.-.rnou. ndvoc:,to, Ic.p:,cr.red ;~or fue :•:')l' I f• {t,n .'. I' ·• \ l'-,!S~>unL.onte Two i:1;:-.in grt:;und.s wore sub..:i ttoll in t!:w G0r.iorc.ndw:1 of ",ppcr..1 ::-..ncl t t.~ tr.' .. ;.,. ~ t!., ey oscontfally chl'.'.llenco the fin<:i;13 o-Z ,,;;.10 lo!'xncc1.. triri.l jud::;o on in:.ri:;.1i ty. f' i·~- . r" ,_ 1:'ro□ t:lo proceO(lincG both in t:..,is court n.ncl t:1e coui•t below, it io r,ppr.ront .: : / t , t r.10ot of tlle prir.1~ □r..tte:rs in 'c).].ir; c·~oc- 1:'.re not in\i.lioputo bo·l;wocn ·hhe I,_. . ~ • I · ,/ i,~r-ties. I'i; is coo;:.,011 ~ound tilnt the ros:xm~'.011t wr-,s one of tto Hives of one 1.· l · r_Phili})O s/o }.nos (P.W,1), a resident of Rwmr,tcto/M-uronc~ vill:i.ec ill Knrr,c,1·10 .... ,L Di;:;t.rict J ~ho oth1:;r ·cwi-Ze-wcT:! -:luf[ib1in' w::.ion 1:o ;~_;;;·ied in '1978. }.nut:K-r wife Wfl.O ~ :_o,1c, ,:olon::-., n~10s0 n:1rri:'-c•·e to P.W.l ccllnpsod ('.Ud she loft be~iind. two young t; . . . t :~·.n.::.:rcn, n':llnely, Consk.nsi::-. :-.nd Wilson. T.:.o responc'..ent who crot r.:o.rriod to P. W.1 l t" in 19_74, !1"'.d only ono c'..;ild of the co.rri::i.:;c, th-,t is, one ,Don:::.ti• IIelon::-..'s i _"c:..._:n_dron were left unJ.cr tho en.re of tho respond.ant, w:.10 lovocl thoo ·n.s r~ucll ..,. I , :~o sho lovc-d Don~ti, hor own c~ilde f·.,. r'! ·-;., • • : ._/2 ;~ ~ /·.. ~--c._. .. ,

__.t.J ,. .....,.., ;, I I ,. ·~ i1 .. 2 • ' On the 27th/28th juJ.y, 1983, at about 10 pem;.,. P.W.l ho.cl been -sl.ecping I in tho house of Angel in,3., when he was awakened by the rcreams of his ...., c~1ildron, who had boun sleofinC with the rGspondent in o.nother house. When PoW.l arrived o.t -~l:~houso~ he founcl __ ~~--l~oltecl ,::md the respondent wo.s u .. • .' :,. ; . ·:1 · ..}. roluctruit to open the door ::.or aim.- 2is throe children cryinc1 wi t:1 po.in from vicious wounds inflicted by tho P.W .1 broke into the 11.ouse a.nd :.:ou.nd rtll ~i '. respondent with o. bush knife. 'Ille resr,ondcnt wn.s sto.ndinG on the 'bed. o.nd t •· I_ wo.s uttering uninteiir;iblo words liko a mo.cl person. r.w.1 got the impression : •: tho.t the respondent conceived herself o.s o. person o.lreo.dy dead. P.W. l ~~ r: '; ~,·.':\\:raised an a.lo.rm in rc-.sr,onse to which m:l.l'ly people co.me to. the scene ~ncl \~i ·.'(fl~~:~ the injured children to the hospital .'.l.lld- the o.ccu.scd person to Muronc;o fl:_::,. · . Po,r Post. One of the injured e].1ildren, t~l!:'.t is, Consto.n.10., died upon l : __ ) _: rc:.ctl,j,n:g the hosr,i to.l. \ ,. Subsequently, o. post mortem cxc.ninC'..tion wo.s I ~; _ ~·l._. ;:-orform\d on the de'.1.d body. confee:~ed to slns~iing the children with ~ bush knife, though she did not W:t1ile :1t Murongo Police Post tho respondent J i•t~ r· . ·., >,, know

:w~-zy l;J.io 'lctcd ::'.S she did. ., Tho police oscortcJ tho res,:,ondont b:,clt -~~ t . ,)l , to ~:Jr ho':~e..~:i~~.!ho lms:1 knife wo.~..::~tricvocl. It is common ground. also 1 t" tho.t for thrc~ d::i.ys \:irior fo ·~he inci,lent, tlle r-:.spondcnt ho.d been ~ . ii I ,f,.. : \ ·,~ ~ sufJerin,-~ from o.outo mo.}if-~"'.l '.'Jlcl h:i.d boGn un-:1blo fo o::,.t• ,:) .,: •'. W'.w.on the rcs,ondont m:i.cle1:J1or second appoo.ro.nco in tho Iligh Court i < . 1:. (::Jon \~e _11th. August, 1987, tho court m::>.d.c a.n order under tho provisions h,,_ ..... '\ ' . !,.,;I;:l. oi sc_ftif,.n 220 (1) of the Criminnl Procedure Act, for tho r,.spondent to be :r' /:" }-' corai1. tte:d tcr',Isnngo. Monto.l Institution for moclico.l ex2r.1in'l.tion o.nd :!···. _-.:.·.:·,, . . •· r .. ·r :. retior.tf :;Th.es '·~16:~ duly c.."Comined :--,nd. tho peychrio. tic report submi ttode ,!'. ,,. 1· ' ,~ ' ••• '·\ !' ;:·:~ ~~\-; ti,:\. Ii'rom ·t;he pr6ooodings lJoth in this court :-tnd tho co~t below, it is 1.-1' '. ,\ .. . . . f· o.pp'.l:r~t thnt the mo.tters in t:.1is C'.1.Se th-1t ('.re in dispute between .) ,\ \:.· ·'- . } ·~ ! --~., !~'. r I tho r)~I'tios lie wi tl1in :,::t no.now corapo.ss. It is tho prosecution co.so !·,, ,.;•• t :/ . ·· i ·th~t. tho rearondent intended to kill Const'.1.nsio. d/o Philipo whon she .·.(··· ~:\/· cl:lshdd her 'lfi th '.l bush knife. 'lhe defence cl'.so, on tho other

ho.nd, is 'i\; ·_, : ",'t: tll(],t the restiondont w::i.s ins::mo ::tt the time she 'lttac!;::,tl the three ~: ~ '\ ·,; . (.·, children, including the s~id Const~nsi::i. d/o Philipo • '. • " ;:i· ~··: ' . ,j /;_;·:2'.) .' .. 0 Q • ., ./3 -:ftr- i Jl'..r, --~- - - - - - - - - -·- \~.!-. _ _ _ _ _ _....,·.. 1J -'~,:..; ,~ --~ ~ ' h '( (,, ~ ..-;.. , . , ; , ~ Vu;.jl;f;.4A4J!Ai4!1~ ·, ' . ·:· ,◄ / ' : ~ .3 ' . The ma.in point for consideration and decision in this oa.se, therefore is whether the rei:tr,ortdentwns insane at the time cll.e attacked Oonstan~i, d/o Philipo and the two other children. The loarried trial Judge agreed with the two gentlemen assessors, who assisted him, that the respondent was incane ti ~~i..r·· \• at the time she o.tt,acked the throe children. In arriving at this conclusion, ' '; t!le trial court disrego.rded the poychio.tric report of Doctor P. Miclinel of .:"'!~ ,,. Is:1ne;a Medico.I Institution which :::.ppea.red to indico.to th~t tho respondent ,;. wo.s Slllle at the time she o.tt:-.cked the children, though she hod lost her self control. The trip.l court o.cceptcd the evidence of Doctor Mtero.; o. / .•!!' physici~, who tcstH'ied ?..bout the effect of .1n '.l.cct.dci m'll::i.rio. o.tto.ck. The loo.rncd trio.l Judge 1.3_t~_t.§.d i.tL his judgemeiffi- 11Tb.e an.id report is completolyqbliyiolllil;o tho pbysicn.l p:i.thology of the o.ccuscd o.t tho

crucial timo when the act l:, was done - for e.xrunplo in the C"'.se ro.t hr'l1d we lcnow thnt the ~- ! ·-. J· tJ- ~\ ,, .... - accused had 0.11 r-i.cute mnlo.rin. bout, but tho psycl1intrist is not ::i.wo.rc of it. So tl10 opinion of tho psychiatrist in t'.:iis Ci'..SC does not cri::rry much weight• Agrdnst tllt":b we h::we tho c::~pert opinion of Dr, Mtern from tho do;:'cnco sido which hi1150s -::. •~11.',.,1· ~ :, ~ .!•,'·,· \.' on tho pbysicoJ. po:~:'.lology- of the n.ccuscd c.t the c:rucia.i tiJne., 11 • • I ~ . l·l The essence of tho c<-,so for tlw D.P .P. ih this t:'.pponl is thnt t:io trial ,k, ,~ .j court erred in disrcgr.i,rding th.o psychir.-.t:rist :t-oport which is more rolovnnt \ to t:!.le mcnt(l.l st~.to of tho x·o:,!ponclcnt r.,t tho m:,.tcrinl timo t:.1r-J1 tho evidence of the pbysicin.n. With due rm1pect to Mr. Dilo.r.o who nppeo.rod for the D,.P •.P ., we do not t;:iink +,]1:,,t their c".se is well :founded• Dy n.-i.tu_ro, modicnl evidence is opinion evidence, n.nd :tilcods to bo:, tostecl 1)cforc it is nocoptcd. In the pr0sont cc.se the psyc'.,intrio report is not consistent with tho direct -~ I r ·1 r' crc-dible evidence of P.W.1 wb.ose evidence cloc,rly allows th::'.!.t tho respondent t~ ' C'icWO.El beb.1ving like~ci: mnd person. --- "~----~ . . On tb.o ot:.ior ho.nd, tho ovidoncc of Dr• '· j ,,j ~· ,...·i· , ~tore iG consistent with wh2.t P .w .1 sn.w..,

Dr., Mtorr.i. testified for tho •.,,;,l ~- defence in the following words:- -~~- ' ·1.1< ' L I • "Mo.lo.rie. omi effect one mentally. Thero is a kind. of malnric>, c~lled fancipal mo.lm-io. which nffocts tho hond mildly•·. T'aore ·.(~· 1 ~~ is colobr:1.l mo.ln.rin.. Th0 ·mo.lr1.rio. cru1 C<'llGO G. condition Hi th ,. ,,, . t; mD.nio.c outbursts or cggrossivcness• T'no pn.tiont becomes o.geressivo, Such condition C".11 hr:i.ppcn at nicht when one is •i•\' :~, .. i.~ t'l asleep• Th.c pn.tiont docs not know Wh8.-~ io or she is doing. :'•·.:~ If the il1cub,:-:i;ion period hns oln.psocl1 tho colobro.l mnlnrfo. can orupt. T!-:.o mn:niac outbursts onn be rodu.cod by_drucs, but by i taol:t' it c-,n go dm-me It .:'.ll doponde on th~ - t a m ~ , . · If it is too l!i@l then t~10 mn.nw.o outburl:!ts is also high but depending on tho red cells in tho body. If tho tcmporatu.re 't•. -·: goes down then the mo.nic.c outburst also '2'O0s down. ·· . . If not :bre::i.ted it cr.n go up ;,gr,,in. ·· At lor.st ..nftor 36 ~ours,, " It is not necessnry to be l'.. psycl1iatric to know t:10so thingsel':e .,, ' l /., .- ,,,...:,; - ~;,.~ .-.-· 4 '/ In -the light o:f the ovitlonco ,".'.dducod n:t tllo t:rinl, we concur wi'ca tho tri~.l court tb.,1,t the dof.1.mce sitl0 proved, on P. balnnce of probabilities as roqv.ired_ by 1:.:iw, thnt the respondent wc.s ins:-ne nt tllo time she nttnclcod the c:1i1dron,

including the d0cer,sode Sinco ·i;J.ie poet mortcin r0port 0:..':lws t~int t~1c doco-,sod died ns n rem.1lt of tho .'J.ttt:\ck, tho respo1,dont, io clor-..rly responsible for the de:i.tll of t!lc c!1ild 1 but by virtue of t:to r,rovi1.1iono o:::' section 219(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, sllo w::-.s properly fO'l.u'ld 110'-t; r,-uil ty of -the We ;:,,re tll.us botmtl to dismiss t.'1is npponl, :·. ::, I t1nd 1we : order ~ccoi:diri.gly • :-'!· . ' ' :· ])fl.TED o.t MWAUZ.f. t4ih\ 8th dry,y of Doccmber, 1988. ,.'i . ~- ,/4~··-· ____ __,-/ .; Ji'• L. NYALAl-I C:IIEF JUSTICE L. M• 1/iP.KAME JUSTICE OI~ APPEAL •l /' A. M. 11.. OMAR . /•, JUSTICE or APPEAL i: ➔ } thi~- ~~/1. true -~'opy of tho origind / ✓~ (J. II. MSOJJ'l:'E) t• SENIOR DEPUTY REG!S'FRAR ,. I . • I \

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Procedure Act section 219(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Procedure Act section 220(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code section 196

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.