Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The accused committed the act of murder but was insane at the time, as established by the medical report and in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Act, and is therefore not guilty by reason of insanity.
Source excerpt
The accused murdered Cecilia Adrian, but at the time of the offence was insane due to schizophrenia, as established by medical evidence and corroborated by eyewitness testimony. Therefore, he is not criminally responsible for murder by reason of insanity and must be detained as a mentally disordered offender under section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Source excerpt
The accused was found to have committed the act causing the death of the deceased but was insane at the time of the offence, as established by the uncontested medical report and corroborated by witness testimony. Therefore, he is not criminally responsible and must be detained as a mentally disordered offender under the law.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed the criminal appeal to the extent of a special finding: the appellant committed the offence but was not guilty by reason of insanity.
The accused was found to have been suffering from schizophrenia and was insane at the time of the offence, rendering her not criminally responsible for manslaughter. The court relied on medical evidence and witness testimony confirming her mental disorder, and ordered her to be kept in a mental institution as a mentally disordered offender.
Source excerpt
The accused was found to be insane at the time of the commission of the offence, as established by medical evidence and corroborated by witness testimony, and is therefore not criminally responsible for the offence of murder under section 13 of the Penal Code.
Source excerpt
The trial court's failure to comply with its own order for mental examination under sections 219 and 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act before proceeding to trial and conviction was a material procedural error that vitiated the proceedings, conviction, and sentence.
Source excerpt
The accused was found to be insane at the time of the offence and remains insane, thus not guilty of murder by reason of insanity and to be detained as a criminal lunatic pending the Minister's pleasure.
Source excerpt
The accused killed the deceased but was insane at the time of the offence, as established by medical evidence and court observation; therefore, he is not criminally responsible for murder.
Source excerpt
The accused committed the act of murder but was insane at the time, as established by medical evidence and corroborated by witness testimony, and is therefore not guilty by reason of insanity under sections 219(2) and 220(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Source excerpt
Explore more
