19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam 1
- Citation
- 19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam 1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 28 July 1988
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 28 July 1988
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
There was no evidence to support the defence of insanity; melancholy does not constitute a legal defence to murder; the caution statement was properly admitted and the conviction for murder was justified.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence of death affirmed
02
Material facts
Parties
EASYATYA MZELTICJ
Appellant Counsel: Mr. KatabalwaThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Bilwa03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defence of insanity was available to the appellant
- 02
Whether the caution statement was admissible
- 03
Whether the conviction for murder was proper
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant argued that the defence of insanity was available and insufficiently considered by the trial judge; further contended that the caution statement did not comply with legal requirements.
- Respondent
- Respondent submitted that the conviction was fully supported; appellant appreciated his actions and there was no evidence to support insanity.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Concise Oxford Dictionary definition and judicial interpretation
Melancholy is not a legal defence to murder.
- 02
Criminal Procedure Act
Caution statement admissibility governed by Criminal Procedure Act section 53.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
There was no evidence to support the defence of insanity; melancholy does not constitute a legal defence to murder; the caution statement was properly admitted and the conviction for murder was justified.
Obiter and limits
- Melancholy, even if present, has no legal consequence for answering a charge of murder.
- The appellant's peculiar circumstances do not alter the legal outcome.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction and sentence of death affirmed
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 28 July 1988
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 28 July 1988
IN 'L.uJ COTDT OF APBU, OF T.ll.'NZA1fL\ l~T MH.t:...UZA COR!!!~~ ---- E'l.SY.ATYA MZEL"'T!"CJ • • o a o a • o • VEP..STJ,3 TT.ill ::JEPtIDLIC • • • • • • • • • • R-:TISPOlIDEff (Appeal f"..ror.1 the conviction of the Itig,."l Court of T2,11::.cmi0, 2..t Tabora) (Koressa, J) Dated. t}1e 16th da~,- of NoveE1;:ieJ:, 1987 in Criminal Secsions Case Hoo 25 ~f 1983 Tl1is a:ppells..nt Lk,SYLTYA HZBLEiill axed to dec.7-th grandmother the ap:9ellant, had. oet up !1ouseo The foregoint; mw ommon ground., The I!ig].1 Court sittinJ c,t T2,1)O1~a, Korossoy J.,, fol.md Nl.U.~de:r estalllished I , : a.ml o.,cco:rdingly sentenced the appellant, to death., e,ppellant is nou a,JJpe2,linr:; ,J.{fc',inst the 1:is:J.1 Court decision and is be· g repn:sented befoI'e us b~/ EI·~ Kat<100,lm:-., lea:med a..dvocc1teo Tl1c 0,Jpeal is opposed J:Ir~ Kat2.balw2, so1).c)1t to pe:i."'i:aw.dc us the.t tho d fence of insruiity wc1,s o,w.,ilo,bJ.c to his client and that th:o learned t1.'.'i '.l judge d:i_d. aot i sufficiently consideT it., Tie fu:athe::..· contended that a Caution I statement me.de by the .:1:i;i:1:10112,,nt offcmded t.ho lmr as ·t did not comply r-Ir. Bilw•o SE~x.1j_ttcd tl1d the conviction is f _ly su.p:po:'t2.hlo. Tl:e apJ1oll2.nt knou ::::.ncl fu.lly 2.pp1~0cic.t0d uh,::.t he a.id voluntc,ril;{ confosoed to tho mu;_•d_e:;:, c:nd tho:1..'c was no evidence t sup90.rt the defence of Insani t;:{
uhich t:10 1cm~ned tri,.~l ju.dc{c i;, any event O ♦ O•coo/2 II If II Ho do not pro:9oso to rilo.2<.:c a full rostaternci.1t of tho fa s, wb.fob. 2.J.'c fvJ.ly set out in tho RigJ1 Court judgement, except t:~2.t tlJ.c 2-r,pollt,,_nt hit tho docc2.sod i:rith 2,n axe, twice accor tho 2,uto1Jsy repol't, :r:::::.h,. P3, after the do ceased h2.d indicu.tc tl-w,t she 1w,s ~;oin 0 2,way to live 1,it!1 hor gr01m-up son 2-:nd his fen ly bccc,usc she J·:as ill, e,nd tl:.o t1p1Jollant e,nd somo ncir;hbou;.'S h fc,ilcd to clissuad.o her., .According to EY.h.. P3, one of the cut wou..'1 went deep i."'lto tho 1)rain, the occond. one was l:>ono-doo:p in tho l'ocion, o.nd tho doce:,,secl dfod of sovore 1)1•2.:Ln damc,go 2,nd. tr Ero K2..ta;x?,lwc, contended tha,t the o..:ppollant ,;12,s in a m la.ncholy concU.tion so ho sho1.:!1.d have boon found guilty of Hi:mslaugb.t 1' ohly. rt w2.s obvious to us, and 1·re think, 1-i"itJ.1 ros1)0ct, r&'. Kn.tab .lwa . c,lso 1Jcc2.r:10 mrm·o of it clrn::l.l1g tho cot1.:-i:·sc this Court, th2.t tllc :position ho took wns simply Assumj_ng tll2,t the o.ppoll2,nt ·;-ro.,z mcl2,;_1cholic uhcn ho doo.,l t vicious ~)lm-,s, 1-rlicx·o docs tl1is load to? If ho Hc'.S mol2-nch ic it is tmC:tcrstc.,ndc))lc in the 2-l)poll~•,nt I s peculi0.2:.' circvmst.:mcc 1-fV,S a man of strrnr ui t).:. no f2,mi1y of his ovm i · tho dopa:rt the dcce2.scd mea,nt tho loos of a concubine
as well 2-s loss of a.n 2-l)odc bcc::,,usc tho house l10 o.,nd tho deceased b;_-,,d been livin "? in belonged to tho dccc2,~;od Is son. IIouevoi', mcl;:-.ncholy ns su h would lmvc b,:;;on of no lcg'2..l consoq_uci1cc for the l)t"!l~j_Joso of 2,nswo ~ing the c:1,_'"l,]:'C,'O lcid o,t the o,p:poll.:.nt I s dooro :i.s n dcf::.:ncc of Nurdo1· it is unkno,m in ov.:-c books. Tho Concise· Oxfo~,•d Di defines mol[~ncholy thus: H2.bitt1.2-l o~c' constitutional tondonc;y- to sc.,dno s tl1is 2.s 2. dofonco on ,., c:1.:-'.J.'f:P of Hu:PdOii." oven if it ,-rv,s t o thc.t the • aooo/3 trind. to gab at c, little c,tc•au ho foc,nd. floatin{l at ~ago 9 of tho noord 11hioh ,r&s in p;f\ 's ovi:donce tloc,t "For all the ycta,s tho .rcccc'.G d ~~~ mind ., ,. •• and. 11 h2.d. livcd in th~,t v:iJ.J.z·.:;c r,r.; a person of s1..~"1Jr.1ittca. th2-t th(:,t 1r2,G cv:l.doncc of 1nse-nit:~·o The :;:ond.orin:3 is ~ ovid.ci1tly cnti:rcl:r i11co;_1son::mt uith tl10 :i:-ost of t:10 evtdenc0 2.ud uo -.:cc satisf:i.od that it is 1.:·:_ps-.}.G co.lami. nc h.2,v-c no d.01..1.l)t a.~out t~1is c,:.1 ---~-- -· ---- ---·- jvo.ccrncnt at P.. 36: 11 ]):J. t}:w f:j_:wt ::,12,cG, thc:co is the crc-dibJ.c cvid.0ncc of :',?::.to:..- 1',113Xtil1 (?';-f1) ,.-ho indiG})uta))lY testified i:1 court thc.t to the bent of vi'1id mind. e .. o • () a c n C2,ution stdcraont 1):, t'.10 c,:9pcllc,nt L"l ,;11.ich he confcoscd to
tho killing in cj_rcUBst2-nces u~1ich constituted. 1-1wd0:i:'o .In the s~id G2,utio11 st2,tmw:rnt t\o 0,p:_;0llc,nt disclosed.~ into:;.: 2-lio., nuv.l~,.-:,.t i 112,;'nlc..'xi12,t ia m2,:;: ci1ornu kulm' 1:,-,ko niliv1.,1.1'\,\'.JiJ.duc, na mc:i,wazo lo..iJr0.su kt.'.VU."ljilm i"!l2..:.'c::.1cr.1.u ld.chrnJ,nio J:Tilirnk::::.ta sholc ii,8:28. 11 -nl)ili nc, c.la:-,,a,nc;u..1m chini ... o o • • Ur. 1(atr:,1)ahra in 0ffoct invitcd us to ic;i1o:-:c tll.is pln.cc o f, t 4 s ubmitt ed, a no11 cs cat ion Uililor the 1985 .;.ct , nhich hod not even be n enacted 1ilion tho caution ntatcmcnt ,ias s•ocordod in 1982, Tho cle.1,orato sc±ogt.k'°''<is p:wcidcd for under section 53 of tho ()rim:inc,l proccd~~:c Act h2,d not cone into playo \Io arc ,;atisfici!. tho.t there is no substance L'1 this appoo,l v::lich -vr0 accordingly dicmics ontircly6 (1• 11 .. NAK.lll1E) JUSTICE OF A.PF3£\.L (R TT 1r1s~~.-at·) l ., !.~., "- ::i.N --~ JUSTICE OF .'.iJ?PI!l\L (A .. N& A. OTiill) JOSTICIG OF .:U'Pht!L I certify thc:,t t~1is is 3, t:ruo co"9Y of tl1c o:rigin.1lo
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.