FINAL DANIEL BOSCO TARIMO VS REPUBLIC
The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitness testimony and admitted exhibits; contradictions were minor and did not affect the substance; defence evidence, including alibi and alleged insanity, was considered and found insufficient; insanity defence was not properly raised according to legal procedure.
Source excerpt
- Arson
- Occasioning loss to specified authority
- Burden of proof
- Standard of proof
- Defence of alibi
- Defence of insanity