19890725 TZHC Tabora
- Citation
- 19890725 TZHC Tabora
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 July 1989
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 July 1989
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The convictions were justified based on the evidence, including the appellants' possession of recently stolen property and their conduct, which indicated knowledge and participation in the offences. The sentences for the 2nd and 3rd appellants were reduced to the statutory minimum due to their roles.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed in respect of conviction; sentence reduced for 2nd and 3rd appellants
Orders
- Convictions upheld for all appellants
- Sentences for 2nd and 3rd appellants reduced to statutory minimum of 4 years imprisonment
02
Material facts
Parties
HBLlisi Shabani
AppellantBaituni Shabani
AppellantMrcare Md.32yoa
AppellantRepublic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Nyamweya, State AttorneyAmounts and remedies
- Original Sentence (years): 5
- Reduced Sentence for 2nd and 3rd Appellants (years): 4
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the convictions for theft and handling stolen property were justified based on the evidence
- 02
Whether the sentences imposed were appropriate
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellants challenged their convictions and sentences, arguing dissatisfaction with the lower court's decision and denying participation in the offences.
- Respondent
- The State Attorney supported the convictions, arguing that the evidence justified the findings of guilt against the appellants.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law principle, as referenced in the judgment
A person found in possession of recently stolen property may be presumed to be the thief or guilty receiver/retainer unless satisfactorily accounted for.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The convictions were justified based on the evidence, including the appellants' possession of recently stolen property and their conduct, which indicated knowledge and participation in the offences. The sentences for the 2nd and 3rd appellants were reduced to the statutory minimum due to their roles.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed in respect of conviction; sentence reduced for 2nd and 3rd appellants
- Convictions upheld for all appellants
- Sentences for 2nd and 3rd appellants reduced to statutory minimum of 4 years imprisonment
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 25 July 1989
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 25 July 1989
.:;:--::.JLL1.rr:3 TlL...CSJ)' IC '.DIOF ( Tc,110:rL Ro:,;i.s.t:izy) ( ~•(·•\ ~•o o ri5 C.:f' 00 r,~ Cf 87 ,,, ,,.JJ 0".">n,·,-,•1..,.'T. lL.W-. .l. •.. ,.,~.-:".T 1' _,..w _:..,._._._..,u i.J 0 J.• -~ ,:~~:::~~- ·.L C~:r::· :L::::.L C '_.3;J I..Oo :) 01.:"' 1937 OF 'IEJ JJIS'm.ICT COLD.'r OF ·KIJJC~-:JO ~)ISTLUC2: iii .1\TP..OlwO :Doforo JlrCJD~~:. ~Ll'lo,- JI3T..'UC'.f- ~i.'...CUS'ID..t. TZ vorsus 'JU:c>GJfi!DlTT Km.osso,J.,. '·' . ·'Eioso t::.roo aI)poals Eos. 85/07 ?' fJ6/G7 an.:1_ 87/37 hc..vo l)Jon cons.'.)lic":..~.toc'. o.nC. will 1)0 consicbrocl. D,n:1. clotorr.:irocl collectively ~)6co,usc ti10 1.:;_:>pollc,nts :t.e,~ l)oon j-Jintly cl.:c.r:p.:1. 2.ncl. convicted. on t~o 'bo..sj_s :)I tl:o s2i10 o·riclonco c,~ninst t::or.1. T.20 ...'...i):,_,'JOl12..nts l~o • 1 on8 f.fBLlisi Sha1xm (ori,_-:;'inol 4t:.1 .i'..ccusocl) t:·1-J 2nc:. .'.j_))Ollant om '.3ai tuni Sll.::.~:ian (ori3iml 6tb. ~ccusoc.) an::'. 3rc':. .'.'..:9pol1.:111t ono r~rcare fd.32,yo.. (ori::::,'ina.l 7th ::..ccusod.) woro jointly cl1c..rtJDLl with cnt thon convic tocl of tl10 o~~~~o o:c S;:q?~br\~~~~... ; c/s 2'.)6 am'c 265 of t:.::o :'encl Coda, T;:.o I'i.:ppolle..r)its.. wore u~cl::. sotltoncocl :t0'\'"5-';yov..rs ,,' . . ii:1:)riso11nont. Tho ;\::_:ip0ll2-nts cliss;;i. tiaficcl wi tl:. u.o d.ocision. of tho 1,owo; Com~t l:c.vo now ap:i_)Oalod to this Hr. lT;y-r.1..~)iri, · tl:O'· loc.rnoc.1 Stv:tc
1.ttornoy wto a:.;>:voo.rod for t:'....o ao;.)1-f:,J.ic ·'11 oxprqs.socl his support for t!10 convictions a,::,-aim t t:.:o 1:..ppollcnts. On tho ovidonco e..s c.dni ttod by tho lowo:r Court, t110 convictions wore · j':16 tifiocl, ll1-1oro n. person .!.-::.as boon f'.)tUKl in :)osnossion of rocontly stolon :;:>ror,orty l10 qoulc_. oi t::.cr be tho t~::iof or ;.;oil ty rocoivo:rf rotc.L:10r of tt.o so.r.:o m1..1oss :.:.o co..n sntis:Cactorily Q.CCount for 1::is possession of tt.o· sru:.10 C;'Ooo.s. Thero ·wn.s th.0 ovic.onco by 0110 no 6592 r/c Joso:vt. (:,w6) w:::.o :.:;.o.d. 1.Joo;.1 loD. to t!:o ~ouso of tl:o AJ:,')ollant, ono ITe.r1isi Shc.,bnn and. that ·on ;1is o..rrivri,l t}1-:no l".o ]12il. soon tto 3rC: ::..ccusocl (wife 'Jf 1st 1.:.:_i:)~llant) 001:10 out of t.o lnuso t:.::rrr~~ t:'..:.J fr·.mt door nnl tl::.2.t s~o !:'..oo sucld.only-boon sJon roturnin:; b:;,cl: into tl:.o l:ouso. :'W6 w:10 l:.cl b-::cor:io sus:;;icious of tho concuct of t!.1,,3 3r:"L :.p:;:,ollant hurriedly 00t into t:.o 2:,Juso t::ro~ t:::.o f:r,)nt door a.ncl w!lon in tl10 corricl.or of tb.o !J.ouso .. llc b.0-cl wi t:.10ssod tl1>J 3rcl li.i):;oll.o.nt ::an:':. -::ivor n. :n1rcol to tto 2-nd. 1~:)i)Ollo.nt who wns soon runiline nway 'Wi t:J. t~o 1>e..rcol ~')U6 orcloroc.l t::.:..o 2-!'~ics t '):i:° tho 2nc1. il.1,)5?0lln.nt an:1. ~f.:.:on o..rrostod t:10 J¥bol hn:,:;:ionocl to contcin col,jnto
dent~.::\, croan,' ccl,:os of -ncl::o soc.:p; ro.zo.r blncos 1 sr:nll:. ·pD,CUockj porf'I..U:-,9. irlporinl socp, 1Xlcl.sl:oots, pillow· CMOS o tc • ... 2 In vi.en, of t c ovid.Oj.10.0 7 t:.:i.cro 08.,11 :jo i'.10 d.oU1)t t;J.2, t tLo 1s,t L.:ppcllwt hc,cl po.rtic~pc.toc1... in fao co:r:1issio:,.1 o:Z ·L:. c.lloc;od. off-011.00~ SiPil.arly 1 tl-soro cq.n 1X) no cloubt thnt t::10 2nd .'.i..l)~,ollrn1t· r.ncl tho 3rd .,:"i.p:)ollant naclo o.n n.ttoopt to hiclo t'.:::J ' . propn.rty, wll knowinr_; that taoy woro stolon. 'l.11..J.o 2nd 1:.:.,?IlOllo.nt o.ncl t:_,.e. 3:re. -···?:;_)=::_:._ __ .· - ~re_ o.ooordinc::'.lr corrviotocl. of rotainin:s l)l'O:;J.O:!ty k11owin5 tho SQ.1~1~__ .:1;6 ht.VO bo~n stolon property o/s 311 (2) of tl10 ?oral Coc:.o~- rwoulcl llo,10vo11 racluco t~:.o sontonco in rospoct" of t:.:J° 2n:.: il.ppollc;nt o.nc.l° 3rc: .tCC\.lSOC.. so the. t tLoy servo ~.10 niniuun sontonco of -~ yori,rs •. l~1~ot\l. Gisnissod. Jl~~-~4_ . ~~a.o ..- . . ~ ~ > - .rmC".u. : .· t: 25/7/89·,
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.