Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

naufadi omary peter another vs republic 2021 tzhc 9040 24 december 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offences charged are bailable, the application is uncontested, and statutory bail conditions under the EOCCA are satisfied. Bail is granted subject to deposit and surety requirements proportionate to the value involved.

Court disposition

bail granted

Orders

  • Each applicant to deposit Tshs 2,881,250 or a title deed of equivalent value located within Coast region, free from encumbrance.
  • Each applicant to sign a bond for Tshs 2,881,250.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each to sign a bond of Tshs 500,000, resident within Coast Region, with National ID and letter of introduction.
  • Each applicant to surrender passport or travel documents (if any).
  • Applicants' movements confined within Coast Region unless permitted by Resident Magistrate Incharge, District Court of Rufiji District at Utete.
  • Applicants to attend court as scheduled.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge to verify sureties and bail documents before release.

02

Material facts

Parties

Naufadi Omary Peter

Applicant

Herman Hamisi Shabani

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Government Trophies: TZS 11,525,000
  • Value of Government Trophies: USD 6,000
  • Bail Deposit Per Applicant: TZS 2,881,250
  • Surety Bond Per Surety: TZS 500,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial for economic offences involving unlawful possession of government trophies and ammunition.

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants seek admission to bail pending trial, asserting the offences are bailable and the application is uncontested.
Respondent
No opposition to the application for bail.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    section 29(4)(d) EOCCA

    Bail may be granted for bailable offences under section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act (EOCCA).

  2. 02

    Judicial discretion and statutory requirements

    Bail conditions must reflect the value involved in the offence and ensure attendance at trial.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offences charged are bailable, the application is uncontested, and statutory bail conditions under the EOCCA are satisfied. Bail is granted subject to deposit and surety requirements proportionate to the value involved.

Court disposition

bail granted

  • Each applicant to deposit Tshs 2,881,250 or a title deed of equivalent value located within Coast region, free from encumbrance.
  • Each applicant to sign a bond for Tshs 2,881,250.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each to sign a bond of Tshs 500,000, resident within Coast Region, with National ID and letter of introduction.
  • Each applicant to surrender passport or travel documents (if any).
  • Applicants' movements confined within Coast Region unless permitted by Resident Magistrate Incharge, District Court of Rufiji District at Utete.
  • Applicants to attend court as scheduled.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge to verify sureties and bail documents before release.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 24 December 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 24 December 2021

naufadi omary peter another vs republic 2021 tzhc 9040 24 december 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC CRIM APPL NO. 263 OF 2021 (Originating from Economic Crime Case No 07 of 2021 pending at District Court of Rufiji District at Utete before Hon. F. Mjaya-RM) NAUFADI OMARY PETER..................................... 1st APPLICANT HERMAN HAMISI SHABANI................................ 2nd APPLICANT

VERSUS REPUBLIC...............................................................RESPONDENT

RULING 23/12/2021& 24/12/2021 J. L MASABO.: - This is an uncontested application for bail. The applicants stand charged of economic offences in Economic Crime Case No.07 of 2021 before the District Court of Rufiji District at Utete. Their main prayer is that they be admitted on bail pending trial of the case against them. The affidavit and the charge sheet filed in support of the application show that the applicants are charged of unlawful possession of government trophies contrary to section 86(1) and (2) (iii) of the Wildlife Conservation Act, No. 5 of 2009 read together with paragraph 14 of the 1st Schedule and section 57(1) and 60(2) of Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019] (EOCCA) and unlawful possession of ammunition contrary to section 21 of the Firearms and Ammunition Control Act No. 2 of 2015 read together paragraph 31 of the 1st schedule to and sections 57(1) and 60(2) of the EOCCA. It is alleged that on 13th October 2021, at Kilimani village, Rufiji District in Coast Region, they were both found in unlawful 1 possession of 240 kilograms of buffalo meat valued at USD 6,000 equivalent to Tshs 11,525,000/. They were also on the material date found in unlawful possession of one cartridge and one round ball without licence. Considering that the offence gainst which the applicants stand charged are bailable and the application is within the purview of

section 29(4)(d) of the EOCCA and considering further that the application for bail is uncontested, I allow the application and admit the applicants on bail on the following conditions: 1. As the total value involved in the offences is Tshs 11,525,000/=, the Applicants shall deposit Tshs 5,762,500/= being half of the total value. In view of the principle of sharing, since there are accussed persons, each applicant shall deposit in court a sum of Tshs 2,881,250/= or, in the ALTERNATIVE, deposit a Title Deed of an immovable property of the value not less than Tshs 2,881,250/= The immovable property must be located within Coast region and shall be free from any encumbrance. The other half, that is, Tshs 2,881,250/=, will be executed by signing a bond; 2. Each Applicant must produce two reliable sureties and each surety shall sign a bond in the sum of 500,000/=. The sureties must be resident within Coast Region with recognized place of abode and must have National ID and letter of introduction from their respective local government authority; 3. Each applicant shall surrender his passport or any travelling documents (if any); 2 4. The movements of the applicants shall be confined within Coast Region. They shall not leave without the permission of the Resident Magistrate Incharge of the at District Court of Rufiji District at Utete.

5. The Applicants shall continue to attend to their case on the date and time scheduled; 6. The Resident Magistrate in charge of the District Court of Rufiji District at Utete shall verify the sureties and all bail documents before each applicant is released on bail. Order accordingly. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 24th day of December 2021 24/12/2021 X Signed by: J.L.MASABO J.L. MASABO

JUDGE 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Wildlife Conservation Act No. 5 of 2009 section 86(1) and (2)(iii)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019] sections 57(1), 60(2), 29(4)(d)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Firearms and Ammunition Control Act No. 2 of 2015 section 21

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.