sezali emmanuel selesi another vs republic 2024 tzhc 156 22 january 2024
The trial court lacked jurisdiction to try the appellants because the consent and certificate conferring jurisdiction did not contain the charging provisions as required by law, rendering the proceedings, convictions, and sentences null and void. However, since the prosecution evidence was not weak and only the jurisdictional documents were defective, a retrial before a competent magistrate is warranted.
Source excerpt
- Jurisdiction
- Defective consent and certificate
- Retrial
- Wildlife offences
- Firearms offences