omary hamis mponela another vs republic 2023 tzca 17830 15 november 2023

omary hamis mponela another vs republic 2023 tzca 17830 15 november 2023

Applicants accounted for the delay due to their status as prisoners and late receipt of judgment; they demonstrated intended grounds for review under Rule 66(1); respondent did not contest; extension of time granted.

Citation
omary hamis mponela another vs republic 2023 tzca 17830 15 november 2023
Parties
Applicant: Omary Hamis @ Mponela; Applicant: Rashid Hussein @ Chidewa; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Appellate Judgment, Armed Robbery Conviction
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Appellate Judgment Armed Robbery Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Omary Hamis @ Mponela

Applicant

Rashid Hussein @ Chidewa

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether good cause exists to grant extension of time for filing review
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have an arguable case under Rule 66(1)

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants accounted for the delay due to their status as prisoners and late receipt of judgment; they demonstrated intended grounds for review under Rule 66(1); respondent did not contest; extension of time granted.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicants to lodge application for review within 60 days from date of ruling.