Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed Ruby Roadways’ review application, finding the earlier judgment was reasoned and the complaint was really a bid to re-argue the appeal.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier land decision, holding the complaints were not manifest errors and had not shown denial of hearing.
The applicant failed to demonstrate any manifest error on the face of the record; his dissatisfaction with the judgment does not meet the threshold for review. The application is an attempt to re-litigate the merits, which is not permissible under the law governing review.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed Tanzania Breweries’ review application, holding that the alleged error was not manifest on the record and the motion was a disguised appeal.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania granted two prisoners extension of time to seek review of an earlier armed robbery conviction, finding good cause and arguable review grounds.
The Court held that the applicant's grounds for review—alleged manifest error, nullity, or illegality—were unsubstantiated and largely challenged the procedure and evidence in subordinate tribunals, which is outside the scope of review. No manifest error, illegality, or fraud was demonstrated on the face of the Court's judgment to justify review.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for extension of time to seek review, finding a 15-month delay unexplained and the claimed review ground inadequately pleaded.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a review application, finding no manifest error on the face of the record and no denial of a hearing on sentencing.
Court of Appeal of Tanzania dismissed a review application in a land dispute, holding that no manifest error on the record was shown and review cannot serve as an appeal in disguise.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Armand Guehi’s application for review, holding that his complaints about email evidence, error on the record, and nullity were attempts to reargue the appeal.
Explore more
