Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam4

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the injury and the circumstances, including provocation and mitigating factors, and the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of 10 years imprisonment upheld

02

Material facts

Parties

Yotam Balichiko

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Length: 10

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the sentence of 10 years imprisonment for manslaughter was manifestly excessive given the mitigating circumstances

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that the sentence was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the seriousness of the assault, citing mitigating factors such as provocation, first offender status, and time spent in remand.
Respondent
The respondent contended that the sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the injury inflicted and the circumstances of the offence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    R v Wilson Munshya, 5 MLR 87; cited in sentencing handbook

    A substantial sentence for manslaughter is warranted if the injuries inflicted were serious and fatal; if not, only a light sentence is called for.

  2. 02

    Silvanus Leonard Mgumu v Republic (1981) TLR 66

    Appellate courts will not readily interfere with sentences unless they are manifestly excessive or the sentencing court failed to consider material circumstances or misdirected itself.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the injury and the circumstances, including provocation and mitigating factors, and the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion.

Obiter and limits

  • If the injuries had not turned fatal, only a light sentence would have been appropriate.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • sentence of 10 years imprisonment upheld

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 28 July 1988

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 28 July 1988

19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam4

c5 lN illE CotEl.T OF f,.PPi1'.1, OF TDTZANIA crr:r::::D:Tjl, J.PP:::.t,L '1if0 • .'119 OF 19137 YOITAl.~~ BJ.LICf.IKO. • • e • • • o • • 0 • • .lPP~ Versus ~DRJ:8LIC • • • • • l~ND3NT (..l.r:>p0d :!>om the conviction of t!1e D:igh Court of T.::.m,c.nio. at I:11.::.nza) (K::.JI, P.::..r~.) d.c.ted 31st de.;;· of i.U{?;'L1.St, 1987 in JlilX:LiI ~JT OF TITi COUT.i.T KL'ibl~Q':.., J. /J., T'.1is cppe::-J. ~.:;:-iscs from tb.e decision of Lr. s. lir. Kaji1 P:;:-i11cipal Resident I,io.gist:;.'2,te o:~orcising extended ju:dsdiction, in uhich he convicted. the o.j_)pollc.nt fox mr-noJ.;::.t'<'5:1tor nnd sentenced ,.1im to 10 years 1 at the conclusion of;::. full trial the lec:.rned_Principcl Resident l-'fngistrato found b.i;;i e,uil ty only of t::i.e looser offence of m....nslc.:ughter and :;;>rococdod to sentence him a.s o..bovo. The e,ppecl is ~~inst sentence I only. It is l)Ortinent to set out, although very brieny, the back@:'ound to tids mn.ttor. Tho C\'Jl:1ollc.n·~ ~ro.o the hus1J1.,i1d of tho dooo,,,eorl. Tue two ha,d been husb8l1d ,.;;.1d wife for quite some tir.10 wd ll~ hi.1£1 seven ciliildr~n "uotwoen them, fh--c of u~1.om iJ.I'e living. Tho deceL~sed wa.s given to lleo.vy drink.fag, .md this ,':1.ppe~'\.'.:.'S to bo tho source of the .,ppollMt I s qun.r..:-al uith her on mul'ly occn.s,ions. On the dcy of the incident tho dece.csod rott.1rn.0d :1ome at ni::;ht f::-om a

drinking spree; she l·Tn.s drunk. She ;1c.d e.e • • • /2 • ----,· ... ... . - - - · ~ '\..,4 ;..~ -~-~:'.G~cff~-~~ ·f:·•'.·~ -~;~;:~'., .: ;: :_ _~ .~:,~ .':' .'" ~. :_x_ -~~~~:~~£;:;~rd // / . // 2 ("'_, 1)0011 mr.-y fo,.' ,, 00;1,i:i.do:;:,~:)lo ·l,iu10 lorw:i.nc; 1;",_c :··01111~. oldlru:•on n:t bo:st h::J:,:, up rieve:;:ol;T, U3ing c, stick, l•y w,:;ir of :punishment for disobeyinG his o:c·do,:s to stop d.:cinking. In tao c0tu-se of such bodi1~ he inflicted on '.·,.-:;r w~J;::,t t'."o r,1edic:::J. wi t:1ess described 2,a "huc;o wound on t)w ;__,e.::,d" j_nvol ving n depressed f:".:-,,cture of the sb.iJ.l duly took into .:-,ceo1.mt :, m1;:1bcr of mi ti0 "'ti11{:; fr.cto:cs noc:rly ,'.11 of "The acc,:sorl is 41 ;JC~':rs old. ~fo is 2, f:l.rst offcnde:c•. Iie hc.s been in :.:orn,:..n<l. for :-,"bout fot,;,r yc.:::,..•s. IIe w:,..s very hi::;l1J.;y- ;.:,:evoked by the miocornlt!.ct of llia ,d fo ( t:.w <l.oco:•,or.rl), excessive fo:ccc. Ile is ;10:-ce:1y ocnte11ced to 10 (ten) yeas imprisortuent. 11 t}.1::-.t the sentence w;:-,3 ;_,;:•;aif .. stly oxcessj_v~ ;:-J1c1. t-.x•e,vd us to reduce it. Co1..mnel tool<: t:.\o view t;; .:•.t the sovori ty of t)1e sentence rnottcd out w;:,,s out of 11;;~?poxti9p_J;_o_ t:-..o sc:;:-iousnesG ·o:r·thc ;:-.ss;:•,ul ts inflicted. In t;iis connection ho :;.•efen.-od us to tb.e cn.sc cf R. v :·Tilson Uunsh;:,, 5 :H.;:t.L.:a. 87 cited 1,y

3:;.•i;:,n SL"tte:.:-~:T in his book t_itlcd !• :.:·:.:r"ld~,ook On Scntcncin,E_ ::-..t Cou:-.-t Lib::i:'2.'.c'Y n.nd so we lw.d to I'Gly on wh.:-.t the 102..7.'ned .:i.uthor said. "One c:;.-etm.-:i r.n j_n dooicl:lnt?, w-'.1(/t:.•u:..· n o:is0 'of l'lll.11··· sL.~w;::-Lc:;.• c.:i.lls fo:.:- ,:,, oubsk:.nti~J. ::ic;·1te11ce is to ask oneso].f uhcthex if tho inji..u·ies inflicted h.:.d not ttci:'ned to be ·f::,,tcl, 2ny clJ.;.:1•cc, or rmy ♦ • o .., o /3. e • o . • ' ' _ ~.... - ~ ~ . - - - . . _ . . . . • ..._.._ol!w-'1'1, ... <'IJ_ _ • ..__, _ _ ~ ...... - - . . , . ; . , . - - ~ .~".Ik::.._. ~:{t,<~~:~i.\t :-,~' . .,1•-,,.••-:,.l.('C:i-,q-i,;,._,_...,~?.,),, ..,_ ; . I 3 ( f l If the OX!Si-T0r ic no, t~10n only c, lic,:it s0~1tonco is c;-,.,llcd fo:..·. If t'.10 :-..nswor c:.~sc of v Luknnfu.;)~}-..9:.t. (1$70) R.C.D. n.175 cvcntt,1.,~J.l::,- died. ,. • decision o:f t,:~is Co1.i:.:t :i.n t:.1e cc.cc of Silv~·..m,s Lbo11::-,rd Hguxuuo v TI. ( 1981) T.L.:::. 66 1 1.10 s"G.1:mi ttcd t~1::-,t t:,o circi.o:;sk:nccs in tho p:..·oscnt ooe'o,c,eooeoo/4 • . r. ;,. ,,·, L r· 4 Ls '"~ &cnorc.l :,:-1,:J.,J this Court 1·1ill not :':·0~,dily intcrfcr<ai with 2- ,. diffo;.'cnt scntcmc0. T:lis cou:;:t will interfere only in limited m;:-,nifcstly oxccss:i.vc o:: t::.1.:·.t t~w sontonci..."'lG court frdlod to consider 2.. ,·;i:;to:z-:i.::-.1 ci:i.·cw,,st;::;:1ce: ox t,1;:;.t it misdi:roctod.

j_tsolf in some 1n·ocoodocl on :,. ·;,.cone. :-_;:,;j_nciplc in t'..J.,,t it soi.:(:;~·,.t to l)unish tho r.:-..tllor ;:-,p:pcll,".nt not i'o:: :1:~;3 ,:.:;~ .:ul ts 011 t}.c doce,·.~sc.,d. but L fo:i.' t:·;.o :~ consoq_,.,_oncc,s o:f ::n:,cL .~.CJf32.c'.l ts w]~ ich consoqt.•.onc:::s were not :rc2,3on;:-,:.Jly 110:;-.:}1".:>ours t:,:focl to i.:."lt8:cvonc, ho rc1)01lod t'.1m:1 ,:-..nd i...-iflicted 2.. vicious 2..ss.--.1.11 t on one of t:.:.cii'. (P. 'f. 3) w;1ich sent :1ir.1 to t;,o e;round. c,~uoi,1;:-: hin (_ dccoc.sod du:cin:; t: .o ;:-,ss;:-,u.1 ts w2.s · ,.,_, hu.:so 110l!l1d on t).:.c hcim involvinc; do::;i:cossod :i:':r2-ctlu.'O o:::' t:·lr, skull. · Obviously t>,,.t il,"'.S .:i. s0riou..s injtu.'y-a llo inflicted on t::.c cl.ccc,.~scd. Indeed t:"c cotu.'t :1-~ .::, dut~~ to iir.posc . --· • / fo:-c t;... c dr..n2''L:l'Ol!.Sl183~ of t}.:.O:JC c.co: ,...,.1 tG. It is not clo.--.:,_• w.... :::t:.,.0:..· t,10 cou:i.·t ovo:i.'lool:-:ic. To :;:;,V'O t:~o \,t);1c.fi i; o:r t:,.:-.t ,J.oul)t to t:.i.0 ,•,:· :·::,~J.J.,·;1t, 1'70 j)l'OCOOLl. Oll t:·.o :c; •J~~□ :!..rJ t.~:... ·:L j_t O\.T .. :.lrJo:.:...tl. :i.to cot-.:,:t clnly cons:i.c].0:•corl t> ·.t ch•ct'rnst:-.nco, it ,;o..'.ld. h"·,vc co1:1c to 8, tho .-,ppolli:·-'""lt uo.s ldllin.:::, )1c:;.• 2.nd plc,:·.dcd fo:c• P.o-:::cy ::mt tl1.o ,.-.::_ipollc..z1t FOJ~, r.t lc,;:.st it uust 0 • Cl ". O /6. • . 6 I ( L • !,1. IvI.C.KM IL!) JU3TIC3 OF ~'J'P:W., (::I. II. KL'3J;NGA) JUSTIC~ OF Al'PDAL (A.. l'f • .A. OE..L.1) JU:5TIC OF .APP.2AL I cc:;:-tif'<J thn.t this iG ... t:mc col)y of the o:.:i::;-in.:.1.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

R v Wilson Munshya, 5 MLR 87

Case cited

Silvanus Leonard Mgumu v Republic (1981) TLR 66

Case cited

Lukanfu (1970) RCD 175

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.