19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam4
- Citation
- 19880728 TZCA Dar es Salaam4
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 28 July 1988
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 28 July 1988
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the injury and the circumstances, including provocation and mitigating factors, and the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence of 10 years imprisonment upheld
02
Material facts
Parties
Yotam Balichiko
AppellantRepublic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Sentence Length: 10
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the sentence of 10 years imprisonment for manslaughter was manifestly excessive given the mitigating circumstances
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the sentence was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the seriousness of the assault, citing mitigating factors such as provocation, first offender status, and time spent in remand.
- Respondent
- The respondent contended that the sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the injury inflicted and the circumstances of the offence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
R v Wilson Munshya, 5 MLR 87; cited in sentencing handbook
A substantial sentence for manslaughter is warranted if the injuries inflicted were serious and fatal; if not, only a light sentence is called for.
- 02
Silvanus Leonard Mgumu v Republic (1981) TLR 66
Appellate courts will not readily interfere with sentences unless they are manifestly excessive or the sentencing court failed to consider material circumstances or misdirected itself.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the injury and the circumstances, including provocation and mitigating factors, and the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion.
Obiter and limits
- If the injuries had not turned fatal, only a light sentence would have been appropriate.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- sentence of 10 years imprisonment upheld
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 28 July 1988
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 28 July 1988
c5 lN illE CotEl.T OF f,.PPi1'.1, OF TDTZANIA crr:r::::D:Tjl, J.PP:::.t,L '1if0 • .'119 OF 19137 YOITAl.~~ BJ.LICf.IKO. • • e • • • o • • 0 • • .lPP~ Versus ~DRJ:8LIC • • • • • l~ND3NT (..l.r:>p0d :!>om the conviction of t!1e D:igh Court of T.::.m,c.nio. at I:11.::.nza) (K::.JI, P.::..r~.) d.c.ted 31st de.;;· of i.U{?;'L1.St, 1987 in JlilX:LiI ~JT OF TITi COUT.i.T KL'ibl~Q':.., J. /J., T'.1is cppe::-J. ~.:;:-iscs from tb.e decision of Lr. s. lir. Kaji1 P:;:-i11cipal Resident I,io.gist:;.'2,te o:~orcising extended ju:dsdiction, in uhich he convicted. the o.j_)pollc.nt fox mr-noJ.;::.t'<'5:1tor nnd sentenced ,.1im to 10 years 1 at the conclusion of;::. full trial the lec:.rned_Principcl Resident l-'fngistrato found b.i;;i e,uil ty only of t::i.e looser offence of m....nslc.:ughter and :;;>rococdod to sentence him a.s o..bovo. The e,ppecl is ~~inst sentence I only. It is l)Ortinent to set out, although very brieny, the back@:'ound to tids mn.ttor. Tho C\'Jl:1ollc.n·~ ~ro.o the hus1J1.,i1d of tho dooo,,,eorl. Tue two ha,d been husb8l1d ,.;;.1d wife for quite some tir.10 wd ll~ hi.1£1 seven ciliildr~n "uotwoen them, fh--c of u~1.om iJ.I'e living. Tho deceL~sed wa.s given to lleo.vy drink.fag, .md this ,':1.ppe~'\.'.:.'S to bo tho source of the .,ppollMt I s qun.r..:-al uith her on mul'ly occn.s,ions. On the dcy of the incident tho dece.csod rott.1rn.0d :1ome at ni::;ht f::-om a
drinking spree; she l·Tn.s drunk. She ;1c.d e.e • • • /2 • ----,· ... ... . - - - · ~ '\..,4 ;..~ -~-~:'.G~cff~-~~ ·f:·•'.·~ -~;~;:~'., .: ;: :_ _~ .~:,~ .':' .'" ~. :_x_ -~~~~:~~£;:;~rd // / . // 2 ("'_, 1)0011 mr.-y fo,.' ,, 00;1,i:i.do:;:,~:)lo ·l,iu10 lorw:i.nc; 1;",_c :··01111~. oldlru:•on n:t bo:st h::J:,:, up rieve:;:ol;T, U3ing c, stick, l•y w,:;ir of :punishment for disobeyinG his o:c·do,:s to stop d.:cinking. In tao c0tu-se of such bodi1~ he inflicted on '.·,.-:;r w~J;::,t t'."o r,1edic:::J. wi t:1ess described 2,a "huc;o wound on t)w ;__,e.::,d" j_nvol ving n depressed f:".:-,,cture of the sb.iJ.l duly took into .:-,ceo1.mt :, m1;:1bcr of mi ti0 "'ti11{:; fr.cto:cs noc:rly ,'.11 of "The acc,:sorl is 41 ;JC~':rs old. ~fo is 2, f:l.rst offcnde:c•. Iie hc.s been in :.:orn,:..n<l. for :-,"bout fot,;,r yc.:::,..•s. IIe w:,..s very hi::;l1J.;y- ;.:,:evoked by the miocornlt!.ct of llia ,d fo ( t:.w <l.oco:•,or.rl), excessive fo:ccc. Ile is ;10:-ce:1y ocnte11ced to 10 (ten) yeas imprisortuent. 11 t}.1::-.t the sentence w;:-,3 ;_,;:•;aif .. stly oxcessj_v~ ;:-J1c1. t-.x•e,vd us to reduce it. Co1..mnel tool<: t:.\o view t;; .:•.t the sovori ty of t)1e sentence rnottcd out w;:,,s out of 11;;~?poxti9p_J;_o_ t:-..o sc:;:-iousnesG ·o:r·thc ;:-.ss;:•,ul ts inflicted. In t;iis connection ho :;.•efen.-od us to tb.e cn.sc cf R. v :·Tilson Uunsh;:,, 5 :H.;:t.L.:a. 87 cited 1,y
3:;.•i;:,n SL"tte:.:-~:T in his book t_itlcd !• :.:·:.:r"ld~,ook On Scntcncin,E_ ::-..t Cou:-.-t Lib::i:'2.'.c'Y n.nd so we lw.d to I'Gly on wh.:-.t the 102..7.'ned .:i.uthor said. "One c:;.-etm.-:i r.n j_n dooicl:lnt?, w-'.1(/t:.•u:..· n o:is0 'of l'lll.11··· sL.~w;::-Lc:;.• c.:i.lls fo:.:- ,:,, oubsk:.nti~J. ::ic;·1te11ce is to ask oneso].f uhcthex if tho inji..u·ies inflicted h.:.d not ttci:'ned to be ·f::,,tcl, 2ny clJ.;.:1•cc, or rmy ♦ • o .., o /3. e • o . • ' ' _ ~.... - ~ ~ . - - - . . _ . . . . • ..._.._ol!w-'1'1, ... <'IJ_ _ • ..__, _ _ ~ ...... - - . . , . ; . , . - - ~ .~".Ik::.._. ~:{t,<~~:~i.\t :-,~' . .,1•-,,.••-:,.l.('C:i-,q-i,;,._,_...,~?.,),, ..,_ ; . I 3 ( f l If the OX!Si-T0r ic no, t~10n only c, lic,:it s0~1tonco is c;-,.,llcd fo:..·. If t'.10 :-..nswor c:.~sc of v Luknnfu.;)~}-..9:.t. (1$70) R.C.D. n.175 cvcntt,1.,~J.l::,- died. ,. • decision o:f t,:~is Co1.i:.:t :i.n t:.1e cc.cc of Silv~·..m,s Lbo11::-,rd Hguxuuo v TI. ( 1981) T.L.:::. 66 1 1.10 s"G.1:mi ttcd t~1::-,t t:,o circi.o:;sk:nccs in tho p:..·oscnt ooe'o,c,eooeoo/4 • . r. ;,. ,,·, L r· 4 Ls '"~ &cnorc.l :,:-1,:J.,J this Court 1·1ill not :':·0~,dily intcrfcr<ai with 2- ,. diffo;.'cnt scntcmc0. T:lis cou:;:t will interfere only in limited m;:-,nifcstly oxccss:i.vc o:: t::.1.:·.t t~w sontonci..."'lG court frdlod to consider 2.. ,·;i:;to:z-:i.::-.1 ci:i.·cw,,st;::;:1ce: ox t,1;:;.t it misdi:roctod.
j_tsolf in some 1n·ocoodocl on :,. ·;,.cone. :-_;:,;j_nciplc in t'..J.,,t it soi.:(:;~·,.t to l)unish tho r.:-..tllor ;:-,p:pcll,".nt not i'o:: :1:~;3 ,:.:;~ .:ul ts 011 t}.c doce,·.~sc.,d. but L fo:i.' t:·;.o :~ consoq_,.,_oncc,s o:f ::n:,cL .~.CJf32.c'.l ts w]~ ich consoqt.•.onc:::s were not :rc2,3on;:-,:.Jly 110:;-.:}1".:>ours t:,:focl to i.:."lt8:cvonc, ho rc1)01lod t'.1m:1 ,:-..nd i...-iflicted 2.. vicious 2..ss.--.1.11 t on one of t:.:.cii'. (P. 'f. 3) w;1ich sent :1ir.1 to t;,o e;round. c,~uoi,1;:-: hin (_ dccoc.sod du:cin:; t: .o ;:-,ss;:-,u.1 ts w2.s · ,.,_, hu.:so 110l!l1d on t).:.c hcim involvinc; do::;i:cossod :i:':r2-ctlu.'O o:::' t:·lr, skull. · Obviously t>,,.t il,"'.S .:i. s0riou..s injtu.'y-a llo inflicted on t::.c cl.ccc,.~scd. Indeed t:"c cotu.'t :1-~ .::, dut~~ to iir.posc . --· • / fo:-c t;... c dr..n2''L:l'Ol!.Sl183~ of t}.:.O:JC c.co: ,...,.1 tG. It is not clo.--.:,_• w.... :::t:.,.0:..· t,10 cou:i.·t ovo:i.'lool:-:ic. To :;:;,V'O t:~o \,t);1c.fi i; o:r t:,.:-.t ,J.oul)t to t:.i.0 ,•,:· :·::,~J.J.,·;1t, 1'70 j)l'OCOOLl. Oll t:·.o :c; •J~~□ :!..rJ t.~:... ·:L j_t O\.T .. :.lrJo:.:...tl. :i.to cot-.:,:t clnly cons:i.c].0:•corl t> ·.t ch•ct'rnst:-.nco, it ,;o..'.ld. h"·,vc co1:1c to 8, tho .-,ppolli:·-'""lt uo.s ldllin.:::, )1c:;.• 2.nd plc,:·.dcd fo:c• P.o-:::cy ::mt tl1.o ,.-.::_ipollc..z1t FOJ~, r.t lc,;:.st it uust 0 • Cl ". O /6. • . 6 I ( L • !,1. IvI.C.KM IL!) JU3TIC3 OF ~'J'P:W., (::I. II. KL'3J;NGA) JUSTIC~ OF Al'PDAL (A.. l'f • .A. OE..L.1) JU:5TIC OF .APP.2AL I cc:;:-tif'<J thn.t this iG ... t:mc col)y of the o:.:i::;-in.:.1.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.