Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The sentence imposed was excessive given the appellant's age, unblemished record, trivial amount stolen, restitution, and immediate guilty plea; leniency was warranted but constrained by the Minimum Sentence Act.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania reduced a 15-year manslaughter sentence, holding that the trial judge overlooked key mitigation and the deceased had acted as aggressor.
The trial judge failed to properly consider the mitigating circumstances advanced, including the appellant's drunkenness, the fight, his plea of guilty, and time in remand custody, rendering the sentence manifestly excessive and justifying appellate interference.
Source excerpt
The trial judge failed to properly consider material mitigating factors, including the appellant's youth, remorse, plea of guilty, first offender status, and the deceased's role as aggressor, rendering the sentence manifestly excessive and justifying appellate interference.
Source excerpt
The High Court reduced a 15-year sentence for unlawful possession of gemstones after finding the trial court misunderstood the minimum penalty and ignored mitigation.
The High Court reduced a five-year prison sentence for unlawful firearm possession to a fine, citing the guilty plea, lack of criminal intent, and sentencing discretion.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania reduced a manslaughter sentence from 14 to 8 years, finding the original term excessive in light of mitigation.
A criminal appeal against sentence for manslaughter was dismissed. The Court of Appeal upheld a 10-year prison term as not manifestly excessive.
Appeal against sentence for uttering a false driving licence. The High Court reduced the term from 18 months to 12 months, noting guilty plea and first-offender mitigation.
Explore more
