Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Failure to attach a new DPP consent after amending particulars of the charge did not vitiate jurisdiction as the offence and accused remained the same; prosecution failed to prove abuse of position beyond reasonable doubt as there was insufficient evidence of illegal search or undue advantage.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a corruption conviction, and set aside the sentence after finding the prosecution had not proved an essential element.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove embezzlement beyond reasonable doubt and quashed the conviction and sentence.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a 20-year sentence, and held the prosecution had not proved demanding sexual favour beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent acted as an agent of Wete Town Council or had authority in recruitment, and failed to establish the essential elements of the offence. Material contradictions in prosecution evidence and lack of documentary proof undermined the case. The trial judge's acquittal was justified.
Source excerpt
Court of Appeal upheld the conviction for corruption transactions, holding that the complainant witnesses were not accomplices and their oral evidence was sufficient.
The respondents were found guilty based on evidence that exhibit P5 was forged and used to obtain TZS 338,935,337.46 by false pretences, with subsequent transfers constituting money laundering. The first respondent misled his principal by making false entries. The evidence established conspiracy and common intention to defraud Barclays Bank. The prosecution proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The appellant was convicted on the same counts she was charged with under the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act; the trial court did not create new offences or apply laws to convict her outside the charge. The evidence established that the appellant, as imprest holder, retired funds for a ceremony and gifts that never occurred, using false documents. The prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence and compensation order were within statutory limits and lawfully imposed.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant abused his position and occasioned loss to the authority; direct evidence from witnesses and documentary exhibits established the offences; failure to produce certain physical exhibits or call the agent was not fatal given the totality of the evidence.
Source excerpt
The trial judge erred by assessing credibility and weight of evidence at the prima facie stage and by ruling that there was no case to answer; the prosecution evidence established a prima facie case on both counts; the High Court had jurisdiction to try the offences charged under ZACECA.
Source excerpt
Explore more
