Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The conviction was quashed because it was based on inadmissible hearsay and uncorroborated accomplice evidence, with no direct evidence linking the appellant to the crime, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The court found that the first and third accused, acting jointly, murdered the deceased with malice aforethought, based primarily on the corroborated extra-judicial confession of the second accused, which was found to be voluntary, truthful, and supported by independent evidence. The second accused was acquitted due to plausible explanation of her conduct under threats and lack of evidence of prior knowledge or participation.
Source excerpt
The conviction was unsafe due to material contradictions in identification of stolen cows, failure to establish chain of custody, improper reliance on uncorroborated accomplice evidence, and denial of the appellant's right to be heard.
Source excerpt
Conviction based solely on the uncorroborated evidence of a co-accused without the court warning itself of the dangers is unlawful; the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The conviction was quashed because there was no prosecution evidence linking the appellant to the drugs, and the trial court improperly relied on the uncorroborated evidence of a co-accused, contrary to established legal principles and practice. The burden of proof was wrongly shifted to the appellant, and his conduct was misinterpreted as evidence of guilt.
Source excerpt
The conviction was unsafe because the evidence of the key witness (PW1), who had an interest to serve, was uncorroborated, and the trial court did not warn itself of the dangers of convicting on such evidence. Additionally, doubts regarding identification and the failure to call a crucial witness (PW1's husband) undermined the prosecution's case, which was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, set aside convictions for burglary and stealing, and ordered the appellants freed because the evidence was insufficient and uncorroborated.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that the trial court misdirected itself by relying on checks and funds without proper evidence being tendered.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, set aside a 30-year armed robbery conviction, and ordered the appellant’s release unless lawfully held.
The Court of Appeal nullified criminal proceedings for lack of a valid transfer to a magistrate with extended jurisdiction, and also noted evidentiary and defence-related errors.
Explore more
