Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law director of public prosecutions vs david so saire manoti 3 others 2024 tzhc 407 22 february 2024

director of public prosecutions vs david so saire manoti 3 others 2024 tzhc 407 22 february 2024

Section 222 of the Criminal Procedure Code requires dismissal of the charge and discharge of the accused for prosecution non-appearance, not acquittal. The trial Magistrate erred by acquitting instead of discharging the accused.

  • Dismissal for non-appearance
  • Acquittal vs discharge
  • Section 222 criminal procedure code
  • Remedies for prosecution non-appearance
Read case analysis
Criminal law director of public prosecution vs peter kibatala 2014 tzhc 2098 10 october 2014

director of public prosecution vs peter kibatala 2014 tzhc 2098 10 october 2014

The High Court dismissed the State’s criminal appeal, holding that the trial court’s use of “discharge” should be read as an acquittal and that no prima facie case was made out.

  • Corruption
  • Principal-agent relationship
  • Acquittal vs discharge
  • Prima facie case
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20141010 TZHC Dar es Salaam

20141010 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The trial court was justified in finding that the prosecution failed to prove the existence of a principal-agent relationship, an essential ingredient of the offence of corruption. The use of 'discharge' instead of 'acquittal' was a procedural error, not affecting the substance, and was curable by substituting 'acquittal' for 'discharge'. The appeal lacked merit as no prima facie case was established against the respondent.

  • Corrupt transactions
  • Principal-agent relationship
  • Acquittal vs discharge
  • Prima facie case
  • Criminal appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law 19941227 TZCA Dar es Salaam

19941227 TZCA Dar es Salaam

The trial magistrate erred in acquitting the respondent when the prosecution was unable to proceed due to lack of the case file. The applicable law (section 225 of the Criminal Procedure Act) required the magistrate to exhaust the timetable for adjournments and, if the prosecution was still unable to proceed, to discharge—not acquit—the accused. Section 222 was inapplicable as the public prosecutor was present, and section 230 did not apply as no evidence had been led. The High Court also erred in upholding the acquittal. The acquittal is set aside and the matter remitted to the trial court f…

  • Adjournment of criminal proceedings
  • Acquittal vs discharge
  • Application of criminal procedure act
  • Powers of magistrate
  • Interpretation of statutory provisions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 19860710 TZHC Dar es Salaam

19860710 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The High Court set aside a dismissal in a private prosecution, holding section 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code did not apply because the case was not fixed for hearing.

  • Dismissal for non-appearance
  • Restoration of criminal proceedings
  • Acquittal vs discharge
  • Private prosecution
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Private-prosecution
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.