BAKWATA
The respondent failed to prove fraudulent misrepresentation or lack of authority of the signatories to the settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was validly executed, payment of TZS 330,000,000/= was acknowledged, and the agreement constituted full satisfaction and adjustment of the decree. The application under Order XXI Rule 2(2) was proper, and the payment must be recorded and certified as extinguishing the decree.
Source excerpt
- Adjustment of decree
- Settlement agreement
- Fraudulent misrepresentation
- Execution of decrees