Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court granted an unopposed application to extend time for filing an application to vary administration orders in a company matter.
The petitioner failed to provide sufficient, concrete evidence or a non-speculative plan demonstrating how administration would achieve the statutory purposes. The application was based on mere prospects and speculative proposals rather than substantiated turnaround strategies, failing the requirements of section 247(3) of the Companies Act.
Source excerpt
A single director may bring an application for an administration order if acting pursuant to a board resolution; the issue of whether such a resolution exists is a matter of fact and cannot be determined at the preliminary objection stage. The applicant properly cited Section 252(2) of the Companies Act for filling the vacancy of administrator.
Source excerpt
Section 250(3)(d) of the Companies Act precludes proceedings against a company under administration without leave, but does not preclude the company itself from instituting proceedings for its own survival or interests. The applicant's application is competent as the statutory moratorium does not apply to proceedings by the company itself against the administrator or creditor.
Source excerpt
The court found sufficient and convincing grounds, supported by resolutions and affidavit evidence, that the company is a going concern facing financial distress and that administration is likely to achieve the statutory objectives of survival and advantageous realization of assets. The statutory requirements for an administration order were met.
Source excerpt
Petitioner failed to satisfy statutory requirements for administration order under sections 247(3)(a) and (c) of the Companies Act, lacked sufficient assets, viable business, and credible plan for recovery; therefore, administration order cannot be granted.
Source excerpt
A single director may have locus standi to bring an application for administration order if acting on behalf of all directors pursuant to a board resolution, but whether such a resolution exists is a factual matter not suitable for determination at the preliminary objection stage. The applicant properly cited Section 252(2) of the Companies Act for filling the vacancy of administrator.
Source excerpt
The company demonstrated inability to pay its debts and a management deadlock, and no objection was raised to administration. It is not just and equitable to wind up the company; administration is appropriate to salvage the business.
Source excerpt
A petition by a creditor under section 265 of the Companies Act for discharge of an administration order constitutes legal proceedings and requires leave of the court under section 250(3)(d); absence of such leave renders the petition incompetent and liable to be struck out.
Source excerpt
Failure to afford a hearing to the Provisional Liquidator, VIP, and other interested parties before making an administration order, where their rights and interests would be adversely affected, constitutes a violation of the constitutional right to a fair hearing and renders the proceedings, ruling, and orders of the High Court a nullity. The law requires that all such parties be notified and given an opportunity to be heard.
Source excerpt
Explore more
