20180927 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Discrepancies in prosecution evidence were immaterial and did not affect the substance of the case; chain of custody of narcotic drugs was sufficiently established; burden of proof remained with prosecution; written statement was properly admitted as no objection was raised; judge gave reasons for differing with assessors; value of narcotic drugs was properly used for sentencing as per statutory requirements.
Source excerpt
- Trafficking in narcotic drugs
- Chain of custody
- Evidence
- Burden of proof
- Sentencing
- Admissibility of written statements