Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal allowed a criminal appeal after finding a fatal variance between the charge and the evidence on cheques and amounts in a money-laundering case.
The appellant's plea was imperfect, ambiguous, and unfinished, failing to admit all essential elements of the offence charged; the facts did not establish the offence; thus, the conviction and sentence could not stand and the proceedings were quashed.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Mwanza allowed a criminal appeal, finding the prosecution had not proved forgery, false documents, or aiding and abetting beyond reasonable doubt.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania upheld Edgar Gelege’s conviction for robbery with violence, holding that his conduct amounted to aiding and abetting under the Penal Code.
Court of Appeal upheld murder convictions, holding that improperly admitted confessions could be expunged while circumstantial evidence still proved guilt.
The conviction of the appellants was sustained based on overwhelming circumstantial evidence and their conduct, despite the expunging of improperly admitted confessional statements. The first appellant was the last person seen with the deceased, failed to account for his whereabouts, and led to the discovery of the body. The second appellant's presence, failure to dissociate from the crime, and subsequent conduct established his complicity as an aider and abettor. The procedural irregularity in admitting evidence in the absence of assessors was fundamental, requiring expunging of such evidenc…
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the charge sheet defective and holding that admissions at preliminary hearing did not amount to a guilty plea.
The High Court upheld a rape conviction, finding the appellant aided the offence and that the evidence was sufficient. The appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
The evidence established that all four appellants acted in concert to steal the complainant's suitcase, with the first appellant physically taking the suitcase and the others aiding, abetting, or conspiring in the offence. Their continued presence and actions before, during, and after the theft demonstrated joint enterprise. The convictions and sentences were upheld as justified by the gravity of the offence and the evidence presented.
Source excerpt
The High Court substituted convictions for obtaining goods by false pretences after finding petrol was procured on a false Council purchase order, not stolen by servant.
Explore more
