Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appeal was wrongly lodged directly at the High Court Registry instead of the District Court as mandatorily required by law, rendering the appeal incompetent.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Musoma granted a 30-day extension of time to appeal, finding an apparent illegality where the lower court dismissed an incompetent appeal instead of striking it out.
The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay, as the error was a technical mistake beyond his control and he was actively pursuing his rights. The court exercised its discretion to grant an extension of time to file the appeal.
Source excerpt
The appeal to the High Court was time barred as it was filed beyond the 30-day statutory period, and delay in obtaining documents is not a valid excuse; no extension of time was sought as required by law.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for delay, did not account for each day of delay, and provided unsubstantiated or irrelevant reasons; therefore, the application for extension of time is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a matrimonial appeal as incompetent because it was filed directly in the High Court instead of first through the District Court.
The appeal was incompetent as it was filed directly in the High Court contrary to mandatory statutory provisions requiring such appeals to be filed in the District Court; administrative or technological difficulties do not excuse non-compliance with procedural law.
Source excerpt
The appeal was filed out of time without leave of the court, contrary to mandatory statutory requirements. Withdrawal with leave to refile does not extend limitation unless the order specifies a time frame. The appeal is time barred and must be dismissed.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to raise any point of law worthy of certification as required by section 5(2)(c) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act. The matters raised were factual or argumentative and did not qualify as points of law.
Source excerpt
Failure to comply with section 25(3) and (4) of the Magistrate's Courts Act deprived the High Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal; appeal struck out as incompetent.
Source excerpt
Explore more
