Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The trial judge was justified in imposing a ten-year sentence for manslaughter due to the aggravating factor of excessive force used by the appellant, which outweighed the mitigating factors, even though the latter were considered generally. There was no manifest excess or error warranting appellate interference.
Source excerpt
The trial judge did not err in considering mitigating factors or in the exercise of sentencing discretion, but failed to specify the exact period to be served after deducting remand custody, which is required for clarity and proper practice.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal upheld a 7-year sentence for attempted murder, finding no basis to interfere with the High Court’s discretion or its treatment of mitigation.
The Court of Appeal upheld a 10-year manslaughter sentence, holding that although the guilty plea was overlooked as mitigation, the sentence was not excessive.
The Court of Appeal upheld a 20-year manslaughter sentence, finding it not manifestly excessive despite some sentencing misdirection and mitigation issues.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania reduced a manslaughter sentence, holding that eight years spent in remand custody was a material sentencing factor.
The Court of Appeal reduced a manslaughter sentence from 20 to 10 years after finding the High Court had not adequately considered the appellant’s guilty plea and mitigation.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania upheld a 10-year manslaughter sentence, holding it was within the statutory range and not manifestly excessive.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania reduced a 15-year manslaughter sentence, holding that the trial judge overlooked key mitigation and the deceased had acted as aggressor.
The trial judge failed to consider the appellant's plea of guilty as a mitigating factor, which is a material oversight justifying appellate interference with the sentence imposed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
