CR
The evidence established that the appellants sold a house with encumbrances (Plot No. 91 Block 'EE'), falsely represented its status, and obtained TZS 21,000,000.00 by false pretence; the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and the defence was properly considered.
Source excerpt
- False pretence
- Conspiracy to defraud
- Cheating
- Burden of proof
- Evidence evaluation