Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour law finance industrial banking utilities commercial and agro processing industries trade union fibuca vs akiba commercial bank plc 2023 tzhcld 1447 22 september 2023

finance industrial banking utilities commercial and agro processing industries trade union fibuca vs akiba commercial bank plc 2023 tzhcld 1447 22 september 2023

The Respondent had valid economic reasons for retrenchment, evidenced by financial losses, and followed statutory procedures for consultation and notice. There is no legal requirement for Board resolution prior to retrenchment. The Award of the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration is upheld.

  • Retrenchment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Consultation requirements
  • Board resolution
Read case analysis
Labour law JUDGMENT A TO Z 2

JUDGMENT A TO Z 2

The retrenchment was both substantively and procedurally unfair as the employer failed to disclose relevant information and did not properly consult the respondent or the trade union as required by section 38 of the Employment & Labour Relations Act. Notices provided were inadequate and there was no evidence of actual consultation. Acceptance of retrenchment benefits did not estop the respondent from challenging the retrenchment due to the unfair process.

  • Retrenchment
  • Unfair termination
  • Procedural fairness
  • Consultation requirements
Read case analysis
Labour law volcan logistics t ltd vs emmanuel wilbard 2022 tzhcld 776 15 july 2022

volcan logistics t ltd vs emmanuel wilbard 2022 tzhcld 776 15 july 2022

The High Court dismissed a labour revision and upheld a CMA award, finding the employee was not personally consulted before retrenchment and the termination was procedurally unfair.

  • Retrenchment
  • Unfair termination
  • Consultation requirements
  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Unfair-termination
  • Consultation-requirements
Read case analysis
Employment law CIVIL APPEAL NO 121 OF 2022 WATER AID TANZANIA VS CLARE HAULE

CIVIL APPEAL NO 121 OF 2022 WATER AID TANZANIA VS CLARE HAULE

The appellant failed to conduct substantive pre-retrenchment consultation with the respondent as required by section 38(1) of the ELRA and Rule 23(4) of the Code of Good Practice. The retrenchment was procedurally unfair, justifying the High Court's award of compensation.

  • Retrenchment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Consultation requirements
  • Termination of employment
Read case analysis
Labour law CIVIL APPLICATION NO 5 01 OF 2022 RAMADHANI BAKARI 95 OTHERS VS AGA KHAN HOSPITAL

CIVIL APPLICATION NO 5 01 OF 2022 RAMADHANI BAKARI 95 OTHERS VS AGA KHAN HOSPITAL

Application granted on ground of alleged illegality in the High Court decision, which constitutes sufficient reason for extension of time under settled law; technical delay was not established and applicants failed to account for actual delay, but illegality raised in notice of motion sufficed.

  • Extension of time
  • Illegality as ground for extension
  • Redundancy
  • Consultation requirements
  • Additional payments in redundancy
Read case analysis
Administrative law MISC CIVIL CAUSE NO

MISC CIVIL CAUSE NO

The Minister failed to consult relevant local authorities before declaring the Pololeti Game Controlled Area, constituting procedural impropriety and illegality under section 16(1) of the Wildlife Conservation Act. However, the impugned GN No. 421 of 2022 was impliedly repealed when the President upgraded the area to a Game Reserve via GN No. 604 of 2022, rendering the application for certiorari and prohibition academic as the challenged order no longer exists.

  • Judicial review
  • Natural justice
  • Ultra vires
  • Consultation requirements
  • Wildlife conservation
  • Village land rights
Read case analysis
Labour law tanbreed poultry limited vs fainas didas ongundi and 6 others 2021 tzhcld 368 6 september 2021

tanbreed poultry limited vs fainas didas ongundi and 6 others 2021 tzhcld 368 6 september 2021

The High Court upheld a labour revision challenge and dismissed the application, finding no proof that retrenchment consultations complied with section 38 of the ELRA.

  • Retrenchment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Consultation requirements
  • Consultation-requirements
  • Procedural-fairness
  • Labour-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.