Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Failure to attach a new DPP consent after amending particulars of the charge did not vitiate jurisdiction as the offence and accused remained the same; prosecution failed to prove abuse of position beyond reasonable doubt as there was insufficient evidence of illegal search or undue advantage.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania quashed convictions for corrupt transactions after finding the prosecution relied on unreliable dock identification without an identification parade.
The charge on which the appellant was convicted did not disclose the ingredients of the offence under section 15(1)(a) of the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity. Even if the charge were proper, the trial court erred by imposing a custodial sentence without considering the statutory option of a fine for a first offender who pleaded guilty.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal partly allowed a criminal appeal over elephant tusks, quashing the corruption count, upholding the wildlife offence, and reducing sentence.
The conviction for corrupt transaction was not supported by evidence as the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements. However, the offences of obtaining money by false pretence and uttering a false document were proved beyond reasonable doubt by the evidence of PW2, corroborated by documentary and expert evidence. Defects in the charge sheet did not prejudice the appellant and were curable. The chain of custody argument was unfounded as the document was properly traced. Failure to call certain witnesses or produce CCTV footage was not fatal as the evidence adduced was sufficient.
Source excerpt
Material variance between charge particulars and evidence, lack of corroboration, and unreliable witness testimony rendered prosecution case unproven beyond reasonable doubt; conviction cannot stand.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court wrongly failed to consider alleged irregularities in the trial proceedings and granted extension of time to appeal.
The High Court dismissed the State’s criminal appeal, holding that the prosecution had not proved a principal-agent relationship in the alleged corruption counts.
The trial court was justified in finding that the prosecution failed to prove the existence of a principal-agent relationship, an essential ingredient of the offence of corruption. The use of 'discharge' instead of 'acquittal' was a procedural error, not affecting the substance, and was curable by substituting 'acquittal' for 'discharge'. The appeal lacked merit as no prima facie case was established against the respondent.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a criminal appeal commenced by memorandum instead of petition, holding the defect was jurisdictional and not cured by Article 107A.
Explore more
