rweyemamu zakaria
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed statutory rape and impregnated a schoolgirl, based on the victim's and supporting witnesses' evidence, proof of age, and corroborative documents. DNA evidence was not required, and the cautioned statement's admissibility did not affect the outcome. The appellant's defence did not raise reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
- Rape
- Impregnating a schoolgirl
- Statutory rape
- Defective charge
- Admissibility of evidence
- Proof of age