CRIMINAL APEAL NO
The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence from the victim; the defence of impotence was properly rejected as an afterthought and not supported by credible testimony; defects in the charge sheet did not prejudice the appellant.
Source excerpt
- Rape
- Unnatural offence
- Defective charge
- Defence of impotence
- Burden of proof
- Credibility of witnesses