Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
There was no illegality or irregularity in the tribunal's proceedings or order, as the applicant was properly informed of the change in chairperson and had no right to insist on a specific adjudicator. The dismissal of the application was justified due to the applicant's refusal to proceed.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted extension of time after finding the applicant’s 126-day delay was caused by tuberculosis and was not inordinate.
The High Court struck out a land appeal after the appellant failed to file written submissions and failed to appear, holding the appeal was not prosecuted.
The High Court dismissed a land appeal after the appellant refused to testify and produce original documents, finding no bias, no jurisdictional error, and no basis for retrial.
The High Court granted an applicant 30 days to seek setting aside of a dismissal order, accepting that advocate negligence and his military service explained the delay.
The High Court dismissed an application to restore a criminal appeal, holding that the prosecution had not shown sufficient cause for failing to prosecute the appeal.
The High Court at Arusha dismissed an application for leave to appeal after the applicant failed to file written submissions as scheduled.
The applicant failed to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for adjournment and failed to prosecute the matter when called for hearing, amounting to non-appearance and warranting dismissal of the application with costs.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a civil revision after the applicant failed to file written submissions within the court-ordered timetable and did not seek leave for late filing.
The question of whether failure to file written submissions is equivalent to failure to appear and warrants dismissal is contentious and unsettled, justifying the grant of leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Source excerpt
Explore more
