Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellant failed to prove on balance of probabilities that the respondent owed and breached a duty of care, or that the breach caused actionable injury. The evidence did not substantiate the claims, and the burden of proof was not discharged.
Source excerpt
Plaintiffs failed to prove that the 1st defendant's actions during surgery or post-surgery fell below established medical standards or constituted negligence. No evidence established vicarious liability of the 2nd defendant or negligence by the 3rd defendant. The burden of proof was not discharged; thus, no liability attaches to any defendant.
Source excerpt
The respondent breached the contract by failing to repair the appellant's motor vehicle and breached the duty of care, resulting in damage to the vehicle. The appellant is entitled to general damages, repair of the vehicle, and costs.
Source excerpt
The suit is not time barred due to continuous breach by the defendant in failing to refund the purchase price as ordered; objections on res judicata/sub-judice and non-joinder of necessary party are misplaced and do not warrant striking out the suit.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal challenging the sale of mortgaged property, holding that no valuation was legally required and the appellant had not proved irregularity.
The High Court dismissed a medical negligence suit arising from childbirth and later uterine removal, finding no proved breach of duty by the hospital staff.
The appellant failed to prove the best price reasonably obtainable at the time of sale or the average price of comparable land, relying on an outdated valuation report from 2016 for a sale conducted in 2019. The issue of statutory notice was not pleaded or raised during trial and is considered an afterthought. The trial tribunal was not at fault for deciding as it did.
Source excerpt
Appellant failed to prove the best price obtainable at the time of sale or the average price of comparable interests, relying only on an outdated valuation report. The issue of statutory notice was not pleaded or raised during trial and is an afterthought. The trial tribunal's failure to address sale below market value was an error, but appellant's evidence was insufficient.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed I & M Bank’s claim for the remaining loan balance after sale of mortgaged property, finding negligence and bad faith in the valuation and sale process.
The appellant failed to establish that the respondents owed him a duty of care in tort in the absence of a contractual relationship, and did not discharge the burden of proof to show negligence or lack of qualification on the part of the investigator. The trial court correctly applied the law regarding burden and standard of proof, and the appellant's grounds of appeal lacked merit.
Source excerpt
Explore more
