Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Omission to cite the offence section in the consent and certificate deprived the trial court of jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings, convictions, and sentences null and void. A retrial is not in the interest of justice due to evidentiary shortfalls.
Source excerpt
The applicant is eligible for bail as the offence is bailable, there is no objection from the respondent, and the law mandates bail upon satisfaction of statutory conditions, including deposit of half the value involved and execution of bond for the remainder.
Source excerpt
The applicant demonstrated genuine reasons for the delay, specifically technical issues with the Electronic Case Management System, and the respondent did not object; therefore, extension of time was granted.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted bail to four applicants in an economic crimes case, imposing strict reporting, surety, travel, and cash deposit conditions.
Applicants are entitled to bail as the offences are bailable and the prosecution does not object; bail conditions must reflect the statutory requirement to deposit half the value of the alleged crime, shared among all accused, and ensure their appearance in court.
Source excerpt
Bail is a constitutional right; applicants are presumed innocent. Bail deposit must comply with statutory requirements, and the amount is to be shared among accused. Bail conditions must reflect gravity and value of alleged offence.
Source excerpt
The applicants are not entitled to bail because they are charged with trafficking 253.05 kilograms of narcotic drugs, which exceeds the statutory threshold of 20 kilograms for bail eligibility under section 29(1)(b) of the Drugs Control and Enforcement Act.
Source excerpt
The applicant is entitled to bail pending trial as the offence is bailable and the value exceeds the threshold, with bail conditions imposed as per statutory requirements.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to establish any manifest error on the face of the record or deprivation of the right to be heard; the complaints amounted to dissatisfaction with the Court's findings and an attempt to re-argue the appeal, which is not a ground for review under rule 66(1).
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania granted bail to two applicants charged with unlawful possession of government trophies, subject to cash deposit, sureties, reporting, and travel restrictions.
Explore more
